首页> 外文会议>Annual meeting of the transportation research board;Transportation Research Board >Comparison of Self-Reported to Network-Calculated Trip Distances for the California Add-On to the 2009 National Household Travel Survey
【24h】

Comparison of Self-Reported to Network-Calculated Trip Distances for the California Add-On to the 2009 National Household Travel Survey

机译:2009年全国家庭出行调查中针对加利福尼亚州的附加内容的自我报告与网络计算的出行距离的比较

获取原文

摘要

This paper reports on the results of a comparison of self-reported trip distances and times withnetwork-calculated distances and times for the California add-on sample of the NationalHousehold Travel Survey from 2009. Geocoded origins and destinations were obtained through aconfidentiality agreement with the California Department of Transportation, and trip networkdistances and times were calculated using the MapQuest algorithm. All trips that were made onfoot, by bicycle, or by car and that had origins and destinations that were geocoded to the exactaddress or intersection are included in this analysis (more than 100,000 trips). Trip times werecompared only for car trips, while distances were compared for all three modes. The resultsindicate that self-reported distances and times are, on average, longer than calculated distancesand times. Self-reported car and bicycle trip distances appear to be more reliable than selfreportedwalk trip distances and car trip times. Regression analysis identifies variables that affecthow much the self-reported and calculated distances diverge.TRB
机译:本文报告了自我报告的旅行距离和时间与 网络计算的美国国家标准(National)加利福尼亚附加样本的距离和时间 从2009年开始的家庭旅行调查。地理编码的出发地和目的地是通过 与加利福尼亚州交通运输部和旅行网络的保密协议 使用MapQuest算法计算距离和时间。进行的所有旅行 脚,骑自行车或乘汽车,并且其出发地和目的地均已精确地地理编码 该分析中包括地址或交叉路口(超过100,000个行程)。出行时间为 仅对乘车旅行进行了比较,而对所有三种模式的距离进行了比较。结果 表示自我报告的距离和时间平均比计算出的距离长 和时间。自报告的汽车和自行车出行距离似乎比自报告的更可靠 步行距离和乘车时间。回归分析确定了影响变量 自我报告的距离和计算出的距离相差多少。 TRB

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号