首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Cyber Conflict >From the Vanishing Point Back to the Core: The Impact of the Development of the Cyber Law of War on General International Law
【24h】

From the Vanishing Point Back to the Core: The Impact of the Development of the Cyber Law of War on General International Law

机译:从消失点返回核心:网络战争的发展对一般国际法的影响

获取原文

摘要

The law of war was famously described by Sir Hersch Lauterpacht as being 'at the vanishing point of international law'. However, in a historical twist, international legal scrutiny of cyber operations emerged and developed precisely through the optics of the law of war. This paper analyses the influence that the development of the cyber law of war has had and might yet have on the 'core' of international law, in other words, on general international law. It analyses three key dimensions of the relationship between the law of war and general international law: systemic, conceptual, and teleological. It argues that, firstly, a systemic-level shift has taken place in the discourse, resulting in the academic debate and state focus moving from law-of-war questions to questions of general international law including sovereignty, non-intervention, and state responsibility. A better understanding of this trend should allay the fears of fragmentation of international law and inform the debate about the relationship between the law of war and 'core' international law. Secondly, this development has created fertile grounds for certain concepts to migrate from the law of war, where they had emerged, developed or consolidated, into general international law. A case in point is the functionality test, which originated as a compromise solution to determine whether a cyber operation amounts to an 'attack' under the law of war, but which may offer additional utility in other areas of international law including the law of state sovereignty and the law of arms control and disarmament. Thirdly, however, it is imperative that the unique teleological underpinning of the law of war is taken into consideration before introducing its rules and principles to different normative contexts. Paradoxically, a blanket transplantation of these norms might in practice jeopardise the underlying humanitarian considerations.
机译:战争律法是由赫尔赫·劳茨·洛特邦的首席执行官作为“在国际法的消失点”中描述。然而,在一个历史性的扭曲中,通过战争法的光学来说,在历史的扭曲中出现并发展了网络行动。本文分析了网络战争律法的影响,又可能对国际法的“核心”,换句话说,关于一般国际法。分析了战争法与普通国际法关系的三个关键维度:系统,概念和远程。它认为,首先,在话语中发生了一个系统级转变,导致学术辩论和国家焦点从战争律问题转移到一般国际法的问题,包括主权,非干预和国家责任。更好地了解这一趋势应该愿意担心国际法的碎片,并告知辩论战争法与“核心”国际法之间的关系。其次,这一发展为某些概念迁移到战争律法的肥沃原因,他们已经出现了,开发或巩固,进入一般国际法。点的案例是功能测试,它起源于妥协解决方案,以确定网络运行是否在战争规律下的“攻击”,但这可能在包括国家法律的国际法中提供额外的效用主权和军备控制和裁军法律。第三,在向不同的规范背景下的规则和原则引入之前,必须考虑到战争律法的独特目的基础。矛盾的是,这些规范的毯子移植可能在实践中危及潜在的人道主义考虑因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号