首页> 外文会议>Americas conference on information systems >A Rasch Approach to Empirical Field Research in Information Systems
【24h】

A Rasch Approach to Empirical Field Research in Information Systems

机译:信息系统经验领域研究的Rasch方法

获取原文

摘要

The traditional method for construct development in information systems (IS) is based on classical test theory (CTT). While the Rasch approach is more theoretically sound than CTT, it has not been widely adopted in the IS literature. This is probably because CTT and Rash often produce similar results but Rash it is more difficult to perform. However, test equating, an important aspect of Rasch analysis, provides IS researchers with an effective way to develop complex IS constructs such as those that are formative in nature. The current wisdom is that formative constructs should be determined as part of a nomological network (see Petter, Straub and Rai, 2007), but this approach has been shown to be problematic (Edwards, 2010). The approach taken in this study is to treat formative constructs as second order reflective with composites based on the component dimensions (Treiblmaier, Bentler, and Mair, 2010). These notions are illustrated by teasing out the components of the formative construct Interactive Project Control (IPC) in software development projects using a Rasch equating approach.
机译:信息系统(IS)中构建开发的传统方法是基于经典测试理论(CTT)的。尽管Rasch方法在理论上比CTT更合理,但在IS文献中并未得到广泛采用。这可能是因为CTT和Rash经常产生相似的结果,但是Rash很难执行。但是,测试等价是Rasch分析的重要方面,它为IS研究人员提供了开发复杂IS结构的有效途径,例如本质上具有形成性的IS结构。目前的观点是,应该将构成性结构确定为法理网络的一部分(请参阅Petter,Straub和Rai,2007),但是这种方法已被证明是有问题的(Edwards,2010)。本研究采用的方法是将构成结构视为基于组件尺寸的复合材料的二阶反射结构(Treiblmaier,Bentler和Mair,2010年)。通过使用Rasch等效方法在软件开发项目中挑逗形成性构造交互式项目控制(IPC)的组件,可以说明这些概念。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号