首页> 外文会议>Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43rd Annual Meeting Vol.1 Houston, Texas September 27-October 1,1999 >Searching hard-copy (paper) vs.electronic (CRT) documents: role of experience, amount of text displayed, and book metaphor
【24h】

Searching hard-copy (paper) vs.electronic (CRT) documents: role of experience, amount of text displayed, and book metaphor

机译:搜索硬拷贝(纸质)与电子(CRT)文档:经验的作用,显示的文本量和书籍隐喻

获取原文

摘要

This study examined possible sources of differences in searching for informaiton in hard copy (paper) reference books and electronic versions of the same document with powerful search tools. Two hypotheses were advanced-the amount of text displayed to the user at any one point in time and the book metaphor. To test this hypothesis, 30 users were asked to perform several search tasks utilizing each of three document modes (Hard Copy. Electronic Scrolling, Electronic Page Flipping) over three sessions under one of two page length (Short, Long) conditions. Results indicated that there were no differences in search time as a function of document mode; however, the two computer modes were preferred over hard copy. Results were interpreted in terms of user computer experience and the difficulty in using the hard copy documentation when the amount of index and text information displayed to the user is controlled.
机译:这项研究研究了使用功能强大的搜索工具在纸质(纸质)参考书和同一文档的电子版本中搜索信息时可能存在的差异。提出了两个假设:在任一时间点向用户显示的文本量以及书籍的隐喻。为了检验这一假设,要求30个用户在两种页面长度(短,长)条件之一下,在三个会话中分别使用三种文档模式(硬拷贝,电子滚动,电子​​翻页)执行多项搜索任务。结果表明,搜索时间与文档模式无关。但是,这两种计算机模式优于硬拷贝。结果是根据用户的计算机经验以及在控制显示给用户的索引和文本信息量时使用硬拷贝文档的难度来解释的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号