【24h】

(In)consistency of Extensions of Higher Order Logic and Type Theory

机译:高阶逻辑与类型理论扩展的(一致)一致性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

It is well-known, due to the work of Girard and Coquand, that adding polymorphic domains to higher order logic, HOL, or its type theoretic variant λHOL, renders the logic inconsistent. This is known as Girard's paradox, see [4]. But there is also another presentation of higher order logic, in its type theoretic variant called λPREDω;, to which polymorphic domains can be added safely, Both λHOL and λPREDω; are well-known type systems and in this paper we study why λHOL with polymorphic domains is inconsistent and why nd λPREDω with polymorphic domains remains consistent. We do this by describing a simple model for -the latter and we show why this can not be a model of the first.
机译:众所周知,由于吉拉德(Girard)和共量子(Coquand)的工作,将多态域添加到高阶逻辑HOL或其类型理论变体λHOL中会导致逻辑不一致。这被称为吉拉德悖论,参见[4]。但是,还有另一种更高阶逻辑的表示形式,即类型理论变体λPREDω;,其中λHOL和λPREDω;可以安全地添加多态域。是众所周知的类型系统,在本文中,我们研究为什么具有多态域的λHOL不一致,以及为何具有多态域的ndPREDω保持一致。我们通过为-后者描述一个简单的模型来做到这一点,并说明为什么它不能成为第一个的模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号