【24h】

On User-oriented Measurements of Effectiveness of Web Information Retrieval Systems

机译:基于用户的Web信息检索系统有效性度量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Traditional performance measures of information retrieval systems include precision and recall and their variants. While these measures work well in closed-laboratory environments, they are not suitable for practical IR systems such as web search systems for two main reasons. One is that it is not practical to know all the relevant documents in the entire document collection, which is required for the recall measure. The other is that the precision-recall measure doesn't take the rankings of relevant documents directly into account. There are other measures that improve over the precision-recall measure, such as expected search length (ESL) and average search length (ASL). These measures are not intuitive and difficult to compute. We propose in this paper RankPower as an alternative measure for evaluating the effectiveness of IR systems such as a web search system. RankPower takes both the rank and the number of relevant documents in the returned list of documents in response to a given query into consideration. RankPower is bounded below as the number of relevant documents approaches infinity. Thus comparisons among different systems using RankPower become intuitive and easy.
机译:信息检索系统的传统性能度量包括精度和召回率及其变体。尽管这些措施在封闭的实验室环境中效果很好,但由于两个主要原因,它们不适用于实际的IR系统,例如网络搜索系统。一个是知道整个文档集中的所有相关文档是不切实际的,这是召回措施所必需的。另一个是精确召回率度量没有直接考虑相关文档的排名。还有其他一些可以改善精确召回率的措施,例如预期搜索长度(ESL)和平均搜索长度(ASL)。这些措施不直观,难以计算。我们在本文中建议使用RankPower作为评估IR系统(例如网络搜索系统)有效性的替代方法。 RankPower会考虑响应给定查询而在返回的文档列表中同时考虑相关文档的等级和数量。由于相关文档数接近无穷大,因此RankPower受到限制。因此,使用RankPower进行不同系统之间的比较变得直观和容易。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号