首页> 外文会议>Geological disposal of carbon dioxide and radioactive waste: A comparative assessment >The Costs of the Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste
【24h】

The Costs of the Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste

机译:二氧化碳和放射性废物地质处置的成本

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Cost assessments of geological disposal of carbon dioxide and radioactive waste are presented. The scope of the cost assessments covers a range of activities from research, site identification, licensing and construction to operation, closure and post-closure monitoring of the disposal sites. The most meaningful indicator for comparison is the disposal cost per unit of electricity produced. The comparative assessment reveals important differences between the two waste products in the volume of material involved and the precautions to be taken that determine the cost per kWh indicator. The timing of investment to establish the disposal site is an important difference with significant cost implications: investments must be completed before starting CO_2 capture from fossil power plants whereas investments in radioactive waste repositories can be postponed for decades after the waste emerges from nuclear power reactors. The investment costs are significant and mid-course corrections are expensive; hence, both technologies need stable regulatory systems.
机译:介绍了对二氧化碳和放射性废物进行地质处置的成本评估。费用评估的范围包括从研究,场地识别,许可和建造到处置场地的运营,关闭和关闭后监控等一系列活动。最有意义的比较指标是单位发电量的处理成本。比较评估表明,两种废物之间的重要区别在于所涉及的物料量以及采取预防措施来确定每千瓦时成本的指标。建立处置场址的投资时间是一个重大差异,具有重大的成本影响:必须在开始从化石发电厂捕集CO_2之前完成投资,而对放射性废物处置库的投资可以在废物从核动力反应堆中出来后推迟数十年。投资成本高昂,中间修正成本高昂;因此,两种技术都需要稳定的监管系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号