【24h】

COMPARISON OF CFD PREDICTIONS OF MULTI-MODE VORTEX-INDUCED VIBRATIONS OF A TENSION RISER WITH LABORATORY MEASUREMENTS

机译:带有实验室测量值的张力提升器多模涡激振动的CFD预测比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper compares previously unpublished laboratory measurements of the vortex-induced vibrations of a vertical tension riser with predictions of five CFD-based riser codes. The experiments were carried out with a 13m long, 28mm diameter model riser of which the upper 7m was in air, and the remainder in water with a uniform flow generated by carriage motion at speeds up to 1m/s. In-line and cross-flow responses were computed from measurements of the curvature of the riser at 32 stations over its length. Key results are compared with blind CFD predictions in which the flow is computed in two dimensions on each of a number of horizontal planes. The CFD codes used in this exercise represent a wide range of approaches, represented by (1) a vorticity-stream function method using a finite volume technique for integrating the vorticity transport equation, (2) finite elements with linear interpolation functions on a triangular grid, (3) a pressure-correction method in a finite-volume integration scheme on hybrid unstructured grids, (4) a discrete vortex formulation incorporating the growing core size or core spread method to model diffusion of vorticity, (5) a velocity-vorticity method using a hybrid Eulerian-Lagrangian vortex-in-cell method with LES, diffusion computed on a grid, and convection of vorticity by discrete vortices. In individual test cases, maximum computed cross-flow responses were between 23% and 160% of measured values, and there was a much wider range in ratios of predicted to measured curvatures. Overall, average ratios of predicted to measured cross-flow responses were between 59% and 106% for the 5 different codes, and those for maximum in-line deflections between 71% and 109%. Predicted curvatures in either direction were on average between 30% and 170% of the measured values.
机译:本文将先前未发表的垂直张力立管的涡激振动的实验室测量结果与基于CFD的五个立管代码的预测进行了比较。实验是使用13m长,直径28mm的模型立管进行的,其中上部7m在空气中,其余部分在水中,以速度高达1m / s的滑架运动产生均匀的流动。通过对提升管在其整个长度上的32个工位处的曲率进行测量,计算出管道内和横流响应。将关键结果与盲目CFD预测进行比较,在盲目CFD预测中,在多个水平面的每个平面上以二维方式计算流量。本练习中使用的CFD代码代表了广泛的方法,其代表为:(1)使用有限体积技术的涡​​流函数方法来积分涡度输运方程;(2)在三角形网格上具有线性插值函数的有限元;(3)混合非结构网格上有限体积积分方案中的压力校正方法;(4)结合了不断增长的核尺寸或核扩散方法的离散涡旋公式,以模拟涡旋的扩散;(5)速度涡旋该方法使用带有LES的欧拉-拉格朗日混合单元内涡旋方法,在网格上计算的扩散以及离散涡流的对流。在各个测试案例中,最大的计算出的横流响应在测量值的23%至160%之间,并且预测曲率与测量曲率的比值的范围要大得多。总体而言,对于5种不同的代码,预计到测得的横流响应的平均比率在59%到106%之间,而最大轴向偏转的比率在71%到109%之间。任一方向上的预测曲率平均为测量值的30%至170%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号