首页> 外文会议>64th Annual meeting international water conference >Chemical vs. Non-chemical Cooling WaterTreatments – a Side-by-Side Comparison
【24h】

Chemical vs. Non-chemical Cooling WaterTreatments – a Side-by-Side Comparison

机译:化学与非化学冷却水处理–并排比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Two non-chemical cooling water treatment technologies, a pulsed power system, and a hydrodynamicrncavitation device, were evaluated against conventional chemical treatment in a detailed six-month study. The comparisonrnwas conducted at Alcoa’s Mt. Holly Works in Goose Creek, SC. Three identical, non-contact, evaporative coolers used torncool air compressor systems were used as the test sites. The three technologies were installed on the external 600-gpm sprayrnwater loop in these towers. The towers were operated at a range of setpoints representing between 4 – 20 cycles ofrnconcentration. Water quality parameters, corrosion, scaling indices, microbiological (aerobic and anaerobic planktonic andrnsessile, Legionella), and aquatic toxicity data/results will be presented for the different operating conditions. Operating costrncomparisons will also be shared. Conclusions and Recommendations will be presented.
机译:在一项为期六个月的详细研究中,针对常规化学处理对两种非化学冷却水处理技术,脉冲电源系统和水力空化装置进行了评估。比较是在美国铝业公司山进行的。 Holly在SC Goose Creek工作。测试现场使用了三台相同的非接触式蒸发冷却器,它们使用了toncool空气压缩机系统。三种技术安装在这些塔的外部600加仑/分钟喷水循环中。塔在设定值范围内运行,代表4至20个浓度循环。将针对不同的操作条件提供水质参数,腐蚀,结垢指数,微生物学(好氧和厌氧浮游生物,军团菌)和水生毒性数据/结果。运营成本比较也将共享。结论和建议将被提出。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号