首页> 外文会议>American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy;ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings >The Marriage of Residential Energy Codes and Rating Systems: Conflict Resolution or Just Conflict?
【24h】

The Marriage of Residential Energy Codes and Rating Systems: Conflict Resolution or Just Conflict?

机译:住宅能源法规和评级系统的婚姻:冲突解决还是正义冲突?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

After three decades of coexistence at a distance, model residential energy codes andrnresidential energy rating systems have come together in the 2015 International EnergyrnConservation Code. At the October, 2013, International Code Council’s Public CommentrnHearing, a new compliance path based on an Energy Rating Index was added to the IECC.rnAlthough not specifically named in the code, RESNET’s HERS rating system is the likelyrncandidate Index for most jurisdictions. While HERS has been a mainstay in various beyond-codernprograms for many years, its direct incorporation into the most popular model energy code raisesrnquestions about the equivalence of a HERS-based compliance path and the traditional IECCrnperformance compliance path, especially because the two approaches use different efficiencyrnmetrics, are governed by different simulation rules, and have different scopes with regard tornenergy impacting house features. A detailed simulation analysis of almost 15,000 housernconfigurations reveals a very large range of HERS Index values that achieve compliancernequivalence with the IECC’s performance path. In this paper we summarize the results of thatrnanalysis and, by evaluating those results against the specific Energy Rating Index values requiredrnby the 2015 IECC, find those ERIs to be very similar to the conservative (lower) end of the rangernof HERS values identified as corresponding to compliance with the traditional performance path,rnsuggesting that many if not most homes built to the new ERI path’s requirements would havernbetter energy performance than if built to the traditional performance compliance path. Finally,rnbased on the home characteristics most likely to result in disparities between HERS-basedrncompliance and performance path compliance, potential impacts on the compliance process, staternand local adoption of the new code, energy efficiency in the next generation of homes subject tornthis new code, and future evolution of model code formats are discussed.
机译:在远距离共处了三十年之后,2015年国际能源保护法典将住宅能源法规典范和住宅能源评级系统合并在一起。在2013年10月,国际代码委员会的公开意见听证会上,IECC添加了一个基于能源评级指数的新合规途径。尽管该代码中没有特别命名,但RESNET的HERS评级系统可能是大多数辖区的候选指数。尽管HERS多年来一直是各种超越编码程序的中流,柱,但直接将其纳入最流行的模型能源法规中,引起了人们对基于HERS的合规路径与传统的IECCrn性能合规路径是否等效的质疑,尤其是因为这两种方法使用的方式不同效率度量标准受不同的模拟规则支配,并且在影响房屋功能的能源方面具有不同的范围。对近15,000种房屋配置进行的详细模拟分析显示,很大范围的HERS指数值可实现与IECC性能路径的等效性。在本文中,我们总结了该分析的结果,并通过将这些结果与2015 IECC要求的特定能源评级指数值进行比较,发现这些ERI与确定为对应于HERS值的范围的保守(较低)端非常相似。遵循传统的性能路径,这表明,如果不是按照大多数ERI路径要求建造的大多数房屋,则其能源性能要比按照传统的性能遵循路径建造的房屋更好。最后,基于最有可能导致基于HERS的合规性与性能路径合规性之间的差异,对合规性过程的潜在影响,州和新法规的本地采用,受该新法规约束的下一代房屋的能效,讨论了模型代码格式的未来发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号