首页> 外文OA文献 >Parenteral anticoagulation in patients with cancer who have no therapeutic or prophylactic indication for anticoagulation
【2h】

Parenteral anticoagulation in patients with cancer who have no therapeutic or prophylactic indication for anticoagulation

机译:没有抗凝治疗或预防指标的癌症患者的肠胃外抗凝治疗

摘要

Anticoagulation may improve survival in patients with cancer through an antitumor effect in addition to the perceived antithrombotic effect. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of parenteral anticoagulants in patients with cancer with no therapeutic or prophylactic indication for anticoagulation. A comprehensive search included (1) an electronic search (February 2010) of the following databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) Issue 1, 2010, MEDLINE, EMBASE and ISI the Web of Science; (2) handsearch of conference proceedings; (3) checking of references of included studies; and (4) use of the 'related citation' feature in PubMed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the benefits and harms of parenteral anticoagulation in patients with cancer but no therapeutic or prophylactic indication for anticoagulation. Using a standardized form we extracted in duplicate data on methodological quality, participants, interventions and outcomes of interest including all-cause mortality, symptomatic thromboembolism, major bleeding, minor bleeding and quality of life (QoL). Of 8187 identified citations, nine RCTs enrolling 2857 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In all included RCTs the intervention consisted of heparin (either unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparin). Overall, the effect of heparin therapy on mortality was not statistically significant at 12 months (risk ratio (RR) 0.93; 95% CI 0.85 to 1.02) but it was statistically significant at 24 months (RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.88 to 0.97). Heparin therapy was associated with a statistically and clinically important reduction in venous thromboembolism (RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.37 to 0.82). There were no statistically significant effects on major bleeding (RR 1.30; 95% CI 0.59 to 2.88), minor bleeding (RR 1.05; 95% 0.75 to 1.46) or QoL. The quality of evidence was high for symptomatic venous thromboembolism, moderate for mortality, major bleeding and minor bleeding, and low for QoL. Heparin was associated with a significant reduction of death at 24 months but not 12 months. It was also associated with a reduction in venous thromboembolism but based on the RCTs in this review it had no significant effect on major bleeding, minor bleeding or QoL. Future research should further investigate the survival benefit of different types of anticoagulants in patients with different types and stages of cancer. The decision for a patient with cancer to start heparin therapy for survival benefit should balance the benefits and downsides and integrate the patient's values and preferences
机译:除可感知的抗血栓形成作用外,抗凝作用还可通过抗肿瘤作用改善癌症患者的生存率。在没有抗凝治疗或预防指标的癌症患者中,评估肠胃外抗凝剂的疗效和安全性。全面的搜索包括(1)以下数据库的电子搜索(2010年2月):Cochrane对照试验中央注册簿(CENTRAL),2010年第1期,MEDLINE,EMBASE和ISI Web of Science; (2)手工搜寻会议记录; (3)检查纳入研究的参考文献; (4)在PubMed中使用“相关引用”功能。随机对照试验(RCT)评估了肠胃外抗凝治疗对癌症患者的利弊,但无抗凝治疗或预防指标。使用标准化表格,我们从方法学质量,参与者,干预措施和感兴趣的结果(包括全因死亡率,症状性血栓栓塞,严重出血,轻微出血和生活质量(QoL))的重复数据中提取了重复数据。在确定的8187篇文献中,有9篇RCT纳入2857例患者,符合纳入标准。在所有纳入的随机对照试验中,干预措施均由肝素(普通肝素或低分子量肝素)组成。总体而言,肝素治疗对死亡率的影响在12个月时无统计学意义(风险比(RR)0.93; 95%CI 0.85至1.02),但在24个月时有统计学意义(RR 0.92; 95%CI 0.88至0.97)。 。肝素治疗与静脉血栓栓塞的统计学上和临床上重要的降低相关(RR 0.55; 95%CI 0.37至0.82)。对大出血(RR 1.30; 95%CI 0.59至2.88),小出血(RR 1.05; 95%0.75至1.46)或QoL均无统计学意义。有症状的静脉血栓栓塞的证据质量高,死亡率,大出血和小出血的证据中等,而QoL的证据质量低。肝素可显着降低24个月而不是12个月的死亡。它也与静脉血栓栓塞的减少有关,但根据本评价中的RCT,它对大出血,小出血或生活质量没有明显影响。未来的研究应进一步研究不同类型的抗凝剂在患有不同类型和阶段的癌症患者中的生存获益。癌症患者开始肝素治疗以求生存的决定应权衡利益和弊端,并综合患者的价值观和偏好

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号