首页> 外文OA文献 >Elemental Analysis and Forensic Comparison of Soils by Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) and Laser Ablation Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS)
【2h】

Elemental Analysis and Forensic Comparison of Soils by Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) and Laser Ablation Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS)

机译:激光诱导击穿光谱(LIBs)和激光烧蚀电感耦合等离子体质谱(La-ICp-ms)对土壤的元素分析和法医学比较

摘要

The elemental analysis of soil is useful in forensic and environmental sciences. Methods were developed and optimized for two laser-based multi-element analysis techniques: laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) and laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS). This work represents the first use of a 266 nm laser for forensic soil analysis by LIBS.Sample preparation methods were developed and optimized for a variety of sample types, including pellets for large bulk soil specimens (470 mg) and sediment-laden filters (47 mg), and tape-mounting for small transfer evidence specimens (10 mg). Analytical performance for sediment filter pellets and tape-mounted soils was similar to that achieved with bulk pellets.An inter-laboratory comparison exercise was designed to evaluate the performance of the LA-ICP-MS and LIBS methods, as well as for micro X-ray fluorescence (μXRF), across multiple laboratories. Limits of detection (LODs) were 0.01-23 ppm for LA-ICP-MS, 0.25-574 ppm for LIBS, 16-4400 ppm for µXRF, and well below the levels normally seen in soils. Good intra-laboratory precision (≤ 6 % relative standard deviation (RSD) for LA-ICP-MS; ≤ 8 % for µXRF; ≤ 17 % for LIBS) and inter-laboratory precision (≤ 19 % for LA-ICP-MS; ≤ 25 % for µXRF) were achieved for most elements, which is encouraging for a first inter-laboratory exercise. While LIBS generally has higher LODs and RSDs than LA-ICP-MS, both were capable of generating good quality multi-element data sufficient for discrimination purposes.Multivariate methods using principal components analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) were developed for discriminations of soils from different sources. Specimens from different sites that were indistinguishable by color alone were discriminated by elemental analysis. Correct classification rates of 94.5 % or better were achieved in a simulated forensic discrimination of three similar sites for both LIBS and LA-ICP-MS. Results for tape-mounted specimens were nearly identical to those achieved with pellets.Methods were tested on soils from USA, Canada and Tanzania. Within-site heterogeneity was site-specific. Elemental differences were greatest for specimens separated by large distances, even within the same lithology. Elemental profiles can be used to discriminate soils from different locations and narrow down locations even when mineralogy is similar.
机译:土壤的元素分析在法医和环境科学中很有用。为两种基于激光的多元素分析技术开发和优化了方法:激光烧蚀电感耦合等离子体质谱(LA-ICP-MS)和激光诱导击穿光谱(LIBS)。这项工作代表首次使用266 nm激光通过LIBS进行法医土壤分析。样品制备方法已针对各种样品类型进行了开发和优化,包括用于大块土壤样品的颗粒(470 mg)和载有泥沙的过滤器(47毫克),并用胶带固定小型转移证据样本(10毫克)。沉积物过滤器颗粒和带状土壤的分析性能与散装颗粒相似。实验室间比较练习旨在评估LA-ICP-MS和LIBS方法以及微型X-跨多个实验室的射线荧光(μXRF)。 LA-ICP-MS的检出限(LOD)为0.01-23 ppm,LIBS的检出限为0.25-574 ppm,µXRF的检出限为16-4400 ppm,远低于土壤中正常水平。良好的实验室内部精度(LA-ICP-MS相对标准偏差(RSD)≤6%; µXRF≤8%; LIBS≤17%)和实验室间精密度(LA-ICP-MS≤19%);对于大多数元素,μXRF≤25%,这对于首次实验室间锻炼是令人鼓舞的。尽管LIBS通常具有比LA-ICP-MS高的LOD和RSD,但两者都能够生成足以用于识别目的的高质量多元素数据。使用主成分分析(PCA)和线性判别分析(LDA)的多变量方法已被开发出来。区分不同来源的土壤。通过元素分析区分了仅通过颜色无法区分的来自不同部位的标本。在对LIBS和LA-ICP-MS的三个相似部位进行模拟法医鉴定时,正确分类率为94.5%或更高。用胶带固定的样品的结果几乎与使用小球获得的结果相同。方法在美国,加拿大和坦桑尼亚的土壤上进行了测试。站点内异质性是特定于站点的。即使相隔相同的岩性,相距较大的标本元素差异也最大。即使矿物学相似,元素剖面也可用于区分不同位置的土壤和缩小位置。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jantzi Sarah C.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号