首页> 外文OA文献 >Between cross and swastika – Difficult choices in troubled times A study of Bishop Alois Hudal’s understanding of national socialism as presented in Die Grundlagen des Nationalsozialismus
【2h】

Between cross and swastika – Difficult choices in troubled times A study of Bishop Alois Hudal’s understanding of national socialism as presented in Die Grundlagen des Nationalsozialismus

机译:在十字架与纳粹之间 - 困难时期的艰难抉择对阿洛伊斯·哈达尔主教在国家社会主义基础中提出的对国家社会主义的理解的研究

摘要

Bishop Alois Hudal is a man who is often mentioned when the relationship between the Vatican and the national socialistic Germany of 1933-1945 is discussed. In these cases he is usually presented as a Nazi and sometimes even called “the brown Bishop”. One of the contributing factors for this infamous title, perhaps the most contributing, is the Bishops book Die Grundlagen des Nationalsozialismus. National Socialism is a Weltanschauung with a certain set of doctrines that is hard, or rather impossible, to combine with any other Weltanschauung, whether it is a philosophical or a religious one. The purpose of this essay is to analyse Bishop Alois Hudal perception of National Socialism, as he presents in Die Grundlagen des Nationalsozialismus and compare his conclusions of what National Socialism is, or ought to be according to him, with what modern scholars of fascism and National Socialism today deem as being National Socialism. There is also a hermeneutic aspect to this essay as the Bishop and his views are presented with the consideration of the historical times he lived and worked in. The result of the analysis and the comparison is that Bishop Alois Hudal can not be deem an ideological National Socialist based on the views he presents in Die Grundlagen des Nationalsozialismus . He presents National Socialism as consisting of two wings, a left one and a right one. The right one, which he also considers to be the desired one, is a combination of the conservative part of the, then existing, National Socialistic Party and his own wishful thing. The left one on he describes is what modern scholars today considers as National Socialism. Though that form of National Socialism is something Alois Hudal abhors and distances himself from. Thus he can not be judged a National Socialist.
机译:当讨论梵蒂冈与1933-1945年国家社会主义德国之间的关系时,经常提到的Alois Hudal主教。在这些情况下,他通常以纳粹的身份出现,有时甚至被称为“棕色主教”。主教的这本书(也许是最有名的)是这个臭名昭著的头衔的促成因素之一,这本书是《国民自律主义》。国家社会主义是一门“世界论”,有一套很难或几乎不可能与任何其他世界论相结合的学说,无论是哲学上还是宗教上的。本文的目的是分析Alois Hudal主教在《民族主义国家主义》中提出的对民族社会主义的看法,并将他对民族社会主义的结论或应该根据他的观点与现代法西斯主义和民族主义学者进行比较。今天的社会主义被视为民族社会主义。由于主教及其观点是考虑到他所生活和工作过的历史时期而提出的,所以本文也有一个诠释学方面。社会主义者基于他在“国家民主主义”中提出的观点。他认为国家社会主义由两个部分组成,左翼和右翼。正确的人,他也认为是理想的人,是当时已存在的国民社会党保守部分和他自己的一厢情愿的结合体。他描述的左边是当今现代学者认为的国家社会主义。尽管这种形式的民族社会主义是阿洛伊斯·休达(Alois Hudal)所憎恶的,并且远离了他。因此,他不能被评为国民社会主义者。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bengtsson Elisabeth;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 swe
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号