首页> 外文OA文献 >Legitimacy to develop fair value measurement standards: The Case of the IVSC Discussion Paper – Determination of fair value of intangible assets for IFRS reporting purposes
【2h】

Legitimacy to develop fair value measurement standards: The Case of the IVSC Discussion Paper – Determination of fair value of intangible assets for IFRS reporting purposes

机译:制定公允价值计量标准的合法性:IVsC讨论文件的案例 - 为IFRs报告目的确定无形资产的公允价值

摘要

This research studies, through a content analysis of the comment letters to the IVSC project on fair value determination of intangible assets, the legitimacy of this professional body, or of the accounting associations, to develop measurement standards specific to this accounting concept. At present, with the exception of FAS 157, no professional standard offers clear technical solutions for fair value determination for financial reporting purposes. We have come to the conclusion that, among respondents, accountants are more reserved than valuators in what regards the IVSC regulating of the fair value measurement. The Anglo-Saxon respondents are more open to accept the IVSC DP as compared to respondents from other countries, hence the IVSC legitimacy to develop fair value measurement standards. Generally, we consider that accounting bodies, rather than valuation bodies, should have legitimacy to develop fair value measurement standards.
机译:本研究通过对IVSC项目有关无形资产公允价值确定,该专业机构或会计协会的合法性的评论信进行内容分析,以开发针对该会计概念的计量标准。目前,除FAS 157外,没有任何专业标准为财务报告的目的确定公允价值提供明确的技术解决方案。我们得出的结论是,在IVSC对公允价值计量的监管方面,在受访者中,会计师比估值师更为保留。与来自其他国家的受访者相比,盎格鲁撒克逊人的受访者更愿意接受IVSC DP,因此,IVSC具有制定公允价值计量标准的合法性。一般而言,我们认为会计机构而非估值机构应具有制定公允价值计量标准的合法性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号