首页> 外文OA文献 >The association of faculty's teaching philosophy and teaching behaviour, and critical thinking and self- direction in learning
【2h】

The association of faculty's teaching philosophy and teaching behaviour, and critical thinking and self- direction in learning

机译:教师的教学理念和教学行为,批判性思维和学习中的自我指导之间的联系

摘要

The intent in this study was to investigate in what ways teachers· beliefsabout education and teaching are expressed in the specific teaching behavioursthey employ, and whether teaching behaviours, as perceived by their students,are correlated with students· critical thinking and self-directed learning. To thisend the relationships studied were: among faCUlty members· philosophy ofteaching, locus of control orientation, psychological type, and observed teachingbehaviour; and among students· psychological type, perceptions of teachingbehaviour, self-directed learning readiness, and critical thinking. The overallpurpose of the study was to investigate whether the implicit goals of highereducation, critical thinking and self-direction, were actually accounted for in theuniversity classroom.The research was set within the context of path-goal theory, adaptedfrom the leadership literature. Within this framework, Mezirow·s work ontransformative learning, including the influences of Habermas· writings, wasintegrated to develop a theoretical perspective upon which to base the researchmethodology.Both qualitative and quantitative methodologies were incorporated. FourfaCUlty and a total of 142 students participated in the study. Philosophy ofteaching was described through faCUlty interviews and completion of a repertorygrid. Faculty completed a descriptive locus of control scale, and apsychological type test. Observations of their teaching behaviour wereconducted. Students completed a Teaching Behaviour Assessment Scale, theSelf-Directed Learning Readiness Scale, a psychological type test, and theWatson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal. A small sample of students wereinterviewed. Follow-up discussions with faculty were used to validate theinterview, observation, teaching behaviour, and repertory grid data.Results indicated that some discrepancies existed between faculty'sespoused philosophy of teaching and their observed teaching behaviour.Instructors' teaching behaviour, however, was a function of their personal theoryof practice. Relationships were found between perceived teaching behaviourand students· self-directed learning and critical thinking, but these varied acrosssituations, as would be predicted from path-goal theory. Psychological type ofstudents and instructor also accounted for some of the variability in therelationships studied. Student psychological type could be shown as a partialpredictor of self-directed learning readiness. The results were discussed interms of theory development and implications for further research and practice.
机译:这项研究的目的是调查教师以何种方式在他们所采用的特定教学行为中表达他们对教育和教学的信念,以及学生所感知的教学行为是否与学生的批判性思维和自主学习相关。为此,研究的关系是:教师成员的教学哲学,控制取向,心理类型和观察的教学行为;学生的心理类型,对教学行为的看法,自我导向的学习准备和批判性思维。这项研究的总体目的是调查大学课堂中是否真正考虑到了高等教育,批判性思维和自我指导的内在目标。该研究是在路径目标理论的背景下进行的,并根据领导力文献进行了研究。在此框架内,整合了梅兹罗夫(Mezirow)关于变革性学习的工作,包括哈贝马斯(Habermas)著作的影响力,从而为研究方法学奠定了理论基础。定性和定量方法学都被纳入其中。 FourfaCUlty和总共142名学生参加了该研究。通过面谈和完成曲目库来描述教学理念。教师完成了控制量表和心理类型测试的描述性场所。对他们的教学行为进行了观察。学生完成了教学行为评估量表,自我学习准备量表,心理类型测验和沃森-格拉瑟批判性思维评估。一小部分学生接受了采访。通过与教师的后续讨论来验证访谈,观察,教学行为和库网格数据。结果表明,教师的怀疑教学理念与其观察到的教学行为之间存在一些差异。然而,教师的教学行为是他们的个人实践理论的功能。在感知的教学行为与学生的自主学习和批判性思维之间发现了关系,但是这些变化是跨路径的,这可以从路径目标理论中预测到。学生和讲师的心理类型也说明了所研究关系的一些可变性。学生的心理类型可以作为自我指导学习准备的部分预测指标。讨论了理论发展的结果以及对进一步研究和实践的意义。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kreber Carolin.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1993
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号