首页> 外文OA文献 >Uncemented hip arthroplasty in primary and revision surgery : patterns of bone remodelling and options to influence periprosthetic bone loss
【2h】

Uncemented hip arthroplasty in primary and revision surgery : patterns of bone remodelling and options to influence periprosthetic bone loss

机译:初次和翻修手术中未粘接的髋关节置换术:骨重塑的模式和影响假体周围骨质流失的选择

摘要

IntroductionThe incidence of hip arthroplasty surgery in young and active patients is increasing. Consequently, an increasing number of patients will live with hip prostheses for longer periods of time in the future. The mismatch in modulus of elasticity between the stiffer metal components and the surrounding bone will induce periprosthetic adaptive bone remodelling. The clinical importance of this is still uncertain but the risk of late occuring complications, secondary to periprosthetic bone loss, should not be neglected.This thesis focuses on patterns of bone remodelling around uncemented hip implants and on options how to influence the bone remodelling process.HypothesesWe hypothesized that (1) femoral hip revision surgery with a proximally coated uncemented tapered stem is a reliable procedure, with good results, if bone defects at revision are moderate, (2) the femoral adaptive periprosthetic bone remodelling is pronounced after such an operation, (3) oral bisphosphonates, once weekly for six months, will reduce the periprosthetic bone resorption around an uncemented tapered stem up to 2 years after primary hip arthroplasty, (4) an ultra-short wedge shaped uncemented femoral stem gives less periprosthetic bone loss than a conventional uncemented tapered stem, and finally, (5) an acetabular component with a backside coating of a three- dimensional porous titanium construct gives less peri- prosthetic bone loss than a conventional porous- and hydroxyapatite coated titanium acetabular shell.Materials and methodsTwo different hydroxyapatite coated femoral stems and two titanium acetabular cups, with differing properties regarding shell backside coating and articulating polyethylene, were evaluated.Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured with Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA). Radiographic assessment was done with consecutive radiographs in study I-III. Implant migration was measured with Einzel-Bild-Röntgen-Analyse (EBRA) in study III and with radiostereometric analysis (RSA) in study IV-V. RSA was also used to analyze polyethylene wear in study V. Clinical outcome was evaluated with self administered score protocols.ResultsStudy I: A retrospective analysis of 60 patients (62 hips), with a mean follow-up of 6 years after unce- mented femoral revision due to aseptic loosening, with moderate bone loss at revision, revealed a stem survival rate of 95%. Radiographical signs of stem osseointegration, as well as diminishing peri-implant osteolysis, were recorded.Study II: In a cross sectional study 22 patients from the cohort in study I, with a healthy hip on the contra- lateral side, were evaluated with DEXA after a mean follow-up of 6 years. We noted a large reduction of 36- 45% in BMD in Gruen zones 1-2 and 6-7 compared to the contralateral hip.Study III: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo- controlled trial of 73 patients operated with an un- cemented stem due to primary osteoarthritis, the treatment group was given risedronate once weekly for 6 months. In the treatment group BMD loss in the proximal femur was reduced with 7% 12 months after surgery but no statistically significant reduction was found after 2 years.Study IV: In a randomized controlled trial of 51 patients periprosthetic bone remodelling was evaluated around an ultra short stem, compared to a convention- al tapered stem, in uncemented THA due to primary osteoarthritis. BMD loss was significantly reduced around the ultra short stem up to 2 years after surgery. Study V: In a randomized controlled trial of 51 patients, comparing two acetabular implants with differing properties regarding shell backside coating and articulating polyethylene, no differences in periproshetic bone remodelling, implant fixation or polyeth- ylene liner wear was found, up to 2 years after surgery.ConclusionsAdaptive periprosthetic bone remodelling after uncemented total hip arthroplasty could be reduced with bisphosphonates and with altered stem design. Periacetabular bone demineralization could not be reduced with a new porous titanium construct material. Alpha-tocopherol diffusion of HXLPE liners gave reduced creep but not less polyethylene wear up to 2 years after surgery.An uncemented, proximally porous- and HA- coated tapered stem could be used with good results in femoral revision surgery if bone loss was moderate. Even though stem fixation was excellent, proximal femoral bone demineralization was pronounced.
机译:简介年轻和活跃患者的髋关节置换手术的发生率正在增加。因此,将来越来越多的患者将使用髋关节假体居住更长的时间。较硬的金属部件与周围骨骼之间的弹性模量不匹配会引起假体周围自适应性骨骼重塑。其临床重要性尚不确定,但不应忽略假体周围骨丢失所致的后期并发症的风险。本文着重研究未骨水泥髋关节植入物周围的骨重塑模式,以及如何影响骨重塑过程的选择。假设我们假设(1)股骨髋关节翻修手术采用近端涂覆的非骨水泥化的锥形茎是一种可靠的手术方法,如果翻修时的骨缺损程度适中,则效果良好,(2)此类手术后,股骨适应性假体周围骨重塑明显, (3)口服双膦酸盐,每周一次,持续六个月,将减少原发性髋关节置换术后2年内无骨水泥锥形茎周围的假体周围骨吸收,(4)超短楔形非骨水泥股骨柄的假体周围骨丢失少于常规的非骨水泥锥形茎,最后,(5)髋臼组件,其背面涂层为三维与常规的多孔和羟基磷灰石涂层的髋臼钛外壳相比,完整的多孔钛结构可减少假体周围的骨损失。材料和方法评价了两种不同的羟基磷灰石涂层的股骨柄和两个髋臼钛杯,它们在壳的背面涂层和可连接的聚乙烯方面具有不同的特性。用双能X射线吸收法(DEXA)测量骨矿物质密度(BMD)。放射线评估是在研究I-III中使用连续的放射线进行的。在研究III中,使用Einzel-Bild-Rontgen分析(EBRA)测量植入物的迁移;在研究IV-V中,使用放射立体分析(RSA)测量植入物的迁移。在研究V中,还使用RSA分析了聚乙烯的磨损情况。通过自我管理的评分方案对临床结果进行了评估。结果研究I:回顾性分析60例患者(62髋),股骨无骨水泥后平均随访6年。由于无菌性松动而翻修,翻修时骨质流失中等,表明其茎存活率为95%。研究II:在一项横断面研究中,研究22的研究对象队列中健康髋关节对侧的患者接受了DEXA的评估,研究的结果来自研究I的队列研究。经过平均6年的随访。我们注意到,与对侧髋关节相比,Gruen 1-2和6-7区的BMD大大降低了36-45%。研究III:在一项随机,双盲,安慰剂对照试验中,对73例未手术的患者进行了研究。 -由于原发性骨关节炎而骨水泥化,治疗组每周一次给予利塞膦酸盐治疗,持续6个月。在治疗组中,股骨近端的BMD损失在术后12个月减少了7%,但在2年后没有统计学上的显着降低。研究IV:在51例患者的随机对照试验中,在超短时间内评估了假体周围骨的重塑与传统的锥形茎相比,由于原发性骨关节炎,在未胶结的THA中,茎粗。在手术后长达2年的时间里,超短茎周围的BMD损失明显减少。研究V:在一项51例患者的随机对照试验中,比较了两种髋臼假体,它们在外壳背面涂层和关节聚乙烯方面具有不同的特性,直到2年后,在假体周围骨重塑,假体固定或聚乙烯内衬磨损方面均未发现差异结论使用双膦酸盐和改变茎干设计可以减少未固定全髋关节置换术后的人工假体周围骨改建。使用新型多孔钛构造材料无法减少髋臼周围的脱矿质。 HXLPE衬垫的α-生育酚扩散可减少蠕变现象,但在术后2年内聚乙烯磨损不会减少。如果骨质流失中等,不粘骨,近端多孔和HA涂层的锥形柄可用于股骨翻修手术,效果良好。即使茎固定效果极好,股骨近端去矿质仍然明显。

著录项

  • 作者

    Salemyr Mats;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号