首页> 外文OA文献 >Fair fracking? Ethics and environmental justice in United Kingdom shale gas policy and planning
【2h】

Fair fracking? Ethics and environmental justice in United Kingdom shale gas policy and planning

机译:公平水力压裂?英国页岩气政策和规划中的伦理和环境正义

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The exploitation of shale gas resources is a significant issue of environmental justice. Unevenuddistributions of risks and social impacts to local site communities must be balanced againstudthe economic benefits to gas users and developers; and unequal decision-making powers mustudbe negotiated between local and central government, communities and fracking siteuddevelopers. These distributive and procedural elements are addressed in relation to UKudpolicy, planning, regulatory and industry development. I adopt an explicitly normativeudframework of policy evaluation; addressing a research gap on the ethics of shale gas byudoperationalising Shrader-Frechette’s Principle of Prima Facie Political Equality (PPFPE). Iudconclude that UK fracking policy reveals inherent contradictions of environmental justice inudrelation to the Conservative Government’s localist and planning reform agendas. Earlyudfracking policy protected communities from harm in the wake of seismic risk events, butudthese were quickly replaced with pro-industry economic stimulation and planning legislationudthat curtailed community empowerment in fracking decision-making, increasedudenvironmental risks to communities, transferred powers from local to central government,udand created the conditions of distributive injustices in the management of community benefitudprovisions. I argue that only by ‘re-localising’ the scale of fracking governance can politicaludequality be ensured and the distributive and procedural environmental injustices beudameliorated.
机译:页岩气资源的开采是环境正义的重要问题。对当地站点社区的风险和社会影响的不均匀分布必须与天然气用户和开发商的经济利益相平衡;必须在地方和中央政府,社区和水力压裂现场 uddeveloper之间协商不平等的决策权。这些分配和程序元素是针对英国 udpolicy,规划,监管和行业发展而解决的。我采用了明确的规范性政策评估框架。通过为了您的页岩气伦理学的研究空白,“通过操作施拉德·弗雷切特(Srader-Frechette)的初步政治平等原则(PPFPE)。我得出结论,英国的压裂政策揭示了与保守党政府的地方主义和规划改革议程无关的环境正义的内在矛盾。早期的破坏性政策保护了社区免受地震风险事件的伤害,但是这些迅速被有利于工业发展的经济刺激和规划立法所取代 udud,从而削弱了在赋权决策中赋予社区权力,增加了对社区的环境风险,转移了从地方政府到中央政府的权力, udand在管理社区利益 udprovision中创造了分配不公的条件。我认为,只有通过“重新定位”水力压裂治理的规模,才能确保政治不平等,并且分配程序上的环境不公正现象可以得到改善。

著录项

  • 作者

    Cotton M.D.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号