首页> 外文OA文献 >Regulating Internet Hate: A Flying Pig?
【2h】

Regulating Internet Hate: A Flying Pig?

机译:调节互联网仇恨:飞猪?

摘要

Abstract: This paper will assess the regulation of the internet in the ambit of hate speech expressed digitally through the internet. To do so, it will provide a definitional framework of hate speech, an overview of the internet’s role in the ambit of hate speech and consider the challenges in legally regulating online hate speech through a discussion of relevantudcase-law as well as the Additional Protocol to the Cybercrime Convention. The jurisprudential analysis will allow for a comparison of the stances adopted by the ECtHR and national courts of European countries on the one hand, and courts of the United States on the other, in the sphere under consideration. By looking at regional and national case-law and the initiative of the Council of Europe in the form of the Additional Protocol to the Cybercrime Convention, the paper seeks to provide an overview of the current state of affairs in the realm of regulating hate but also to demonstrate that such regulation, as occurring to date, is dysfunctional, predominantly due to the vast divergence of US-European approaches to the issues of free expression both on and off line. It is argued that due to the very nature of the internet as a borderless and global entity, this normative divergence cannot be overcome so long as traditional approaches to the issue of regulation continue to be taken. The paper’s analysis will emanate from the premise that there exists a need to strike an equitable balance between the freedom of expression on the one hand and the freedom from discrimination on the other.
机译:摘要:本文将评估通过互联网以数字方式表达仇恨言论对互联网的监管。为此,它将提供仇恨言论的定义框架,概述互联网在仇恨言论范围中的作用,并通过讨论相关的 udcase-law和“其他”法律来考虑在法律上规范网上仇恨言论所面临的挑战网络犯罪公约议定书。法理学分析将允许在审议的领域中一方面比较欧洲共同体人权法院与欧洲国家的国内法院采取的立场,另一方面对美国法院采取的立场进行比较。通过研究区域和国家判例法以及欧洲委员会以《网络犯罪公约附加议定书》的形式提出的倡议,本文旨在概述调节仇恨领域的当前状况,而且证明迄今为止这种监管是功能失调的,主要是由于美欧之间在线和离线自由表达问题的方法存在巨大差异。有人认为,由于互联网作为无国界和全球性实体的本质,只要继续采用传统的监管问题方法,就无法克服这种规范上的分歧。这篇论文的分析将基于这样一个前提,即,一方面需要在表达自由与另一方面要免受歧视的自由之间寻求公平的平衡。

著录项

  • 作者

    Alkiviadou Natalie;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号