首页> 外文OA文献 >“We'll have to re-write history”: Postcolonial education on the island state of the Commonwealth of Dominica
【2h】

“We'll have to re-write history”: Postcolonial education on the island state of the Commonwealth of Dominica

机译:“我们将不得不重写历史”:多米尼加联邦岛屿国家的后殖民教育

摘要

This ethnographic study examines the relationships between colonialized education, cultural negotiation, and migration within the context of the colonial/postcolonial island of Dominica. Using postcolonial theory, the overarching aim was to gain understanding of how people of the former colonial island relate to the education they received and how that relationship influenced people’s interactions with their home. The two-month field study consisted of observational notes and 12 semi-structured one-on-one interviews with Dominican-born citizens who attended secondary school on the island. Participants ranged in when they attended secondary school: some attended prior to Dominica’s 1978 independence from Britain; some began before independence, but ended after; and some attended only after independence.The conclusions of this study encompass (1) how participants feel their education reflected and perpetuated Dominican cultural identity, (2) how participants feel their education impacted their perceptions of the needs to emigrate, and (3) how these notions of cultural identity and emigration bolster or diminish each other. Participants felt their cultural identity was, at most, a secondary thought of the education system or was not represented by the education system at all. Some participants saw emigration as needed in order to use their education to become financially successful; others believed that education was a tool for making emigration possible, but only to gain more knowledge before returning to contribute to Dominica. These viewpoints led to questions of nationalism, transnationalism, and cosmopolitanism, concepts which appeared throughout this study. Regardless of a participant’s place on this spectrum of perspectives, attitudes involved cultural negotiation and notions of modernity, and came to be seen as a duality where individuals simultaneously cherished cultural identity while striving to meet standards of modernity that threaten or force adaptation upon said cultural identity.
机译:这项民族志研究在多米尼加的殖民/后殖民岛背景下考察了殖民化教育,文化协商和移民之间的关系。使用后殖民理论,首要目标是了解前殖民岛上的人们如何与他们所接受的教育联系起来,以及这种关系如何影响人们与家的互动。历时两个月的实地研究包括观察记录和对在岛上中学上学的多米尼加裔公民的12次半结构化一对一访谈。参与者上中学的时间不等:一些人在多米尼加1978年脱离英国独立之前就参加过;有些在独立之前就开始了,但在独立之后就结束了;该研究的结论包括(1)参与者如何看待自己的教育并反映和延续了多米尼加文化认同;(2)参与者如何看待他们的教育如何影响他们对移民需求的看法;以及(3)这些文化认同和移民概念相互促进或减少。参加者认为他们的文化身份至多是教育体系的次要思想,或者根本没有以教育体系为代表。一些参与者认为移民是必要的,以便利用他们的教育获得经济上的成功。其他人则认为,教育是使移民成为可能的工具,但只是在回国为多米尼加做贡献之前获得了更多的知识。这些观点引发了民族主义,跨国主义和世界主义的问题,这些概念贯穿整个研究。无论参与者在这种观点上的位置如何,态度都涉及文化谈判和现代性概念,并被视为一种双重性,即个人同时珍惜文化身份,同时努力达到威胁或强迫适应所述文化身份的现代性标准。

著录项

  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号