首页> 外文OA文献 >On the appropriate use of (input-output) coefficients to generate non-survey regional input-output tables: Implications for the determination of output multipliers
【2h】

On the appropriate use of (input-output) coefficients to generate non-survey regional input-output tables: Implications for the determination of output multipliers

机译:关于适当使用(输入 - 输出)系数来生成非调查区域投入产出表:对确定输出乘数的影响

摘要

Regional input-output (IO) tables are constructed as either scaled down versions of national tables or by means of surveys. In the first type, location quotients (LQ) usually use employment structures to account for differences between nation and region. A LQ is designed to scale down national (input-output) coefficients to representative regional ones that are then used to derive regional multiplier effects. In this process there are two main approaches to define regional coefficients. The first one relies on national technological coefficients that show the use of inputs regardless of origin. In the second approach, regional coefficients are derived from national trade coefficients which allow distinguishing the source of origin of used intermediate inputs. Therefore, it is important to be aware of both the implicit effects of the design of LQ's and the implications of applying a LQ to a specific coefficient. The question of relying on national technology or trade coefficients seems to have been a neglected topic in the area of regionalizing input-output tables (Hewings and Jensen, 1986). Jensen et al. (1979), in development of the GRIT regionalization method, favors reallocation of imports to create technological coefficients before applying LQ's. Flegg and Webber (1997) on the other hand apply their quotient to the trade coefficients: "Whilst Hewings and Jensen's analysis is certainly helpful [...]. We are not convinced that it would be desirable to apply LQ's to the national technological coefficients." In this paper we show why traditional LQ's are not designed to scale down tables of technological coefficients and how regional multipliers will generally be overestimated. Six regionalizations are conducted based on three LQ's and both types of coefficients. It makes a great difference what coefficient the location quotients are applied to. If the target is a regional table of intra-regional flows, it is not possible to apply currently available LQ's to a table of technological coefficients. Because of their design, location quotients are not able to capture the absolute imports necessary in the regional production processes. In many cases national technological coefficients will be accepted as regional trade coefficients and regional multipliers will be overestimated.
机译:区域投入产出表以国家表的缩小版本或通过调查的形式构建。在第一种类型中,位置商(LQ)通常使用就业结构来说明国家和地区之间的差异。设计LQ是为了将国家(投入产出)系数按比例缩小到代表性的区域系数,然后将其用于得出区域乘数效应。在此过程中,有两种主要方法来定义区域系数。第一个依赖于国家技术系数,该系数显示了无论来源如何均使用投入物。在第二种方法中,区域系数是从国家贸易系数中得出的,可以区分使用的中间投入品的来源。因此,重要的是要了解LQ设计的隐式效果以及将LQ应用于特定系数的含义。依赖国家技术或贸易系数的问题在投入产出表的区域化方面似乎已被忽略(Hewings and Jensen,1986)。 Jensen等。 (1979),在GRIT区域化方法的发展中,主张在应用LQ之前重新分配进口以创造技术系数。另一方面,Flegg和Webber(1997)将其商数应用于贸易系数:“虽然Hewings和Jensen的分析肯定有帮助[...]。但我们不相信将LQ应用于国家技术系数是可取的。 。”在本文中,我们说明了为什么传统的LQ并非设计成按比例缩小技术系数表,以及通常如何高估区域乘数。根据三个LQ和这两种系数进行六个区域划分。应用位置商的系数有很大的不同。如果目标是区域内流量的区域表,则无法将当前可用的LQ应用于技术系数表。由于其设计,位置商无法捕获区域生产过程中必需的绝对进口。在许多情况下,国家技术系数将被接受为区域贸易系数,而区域乘数将被高估。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lindberg Gunnar;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号