首页> 外文OA文献 >Are exporting firms always a good hedge against currency risk? Evidence from Central and Eastern European Countries
【2h】

Are exporting firms always a good hedge against currency risk? Evidence from Central and Eastern European Countries

机译:出口公司是否总是能很好地对冲货币风险?来自中欧和东欧国家的证据

摘要

This paper analyzes the exchange rate exposure of exporting firms in (the so far rarely addressed) largest Eastern European transition economies, i.e. Russia and three EU accession countries (CEEC-3). It also controls for possible effects of different exchange rate regimes.Substantially improving the results from the existing literature we find for more than 80% of firms in our sample a significant exchange rate exposure. However, the magnitude and direction of firms’ exposure depends on the particular exchange rate and clearly differs between Russia and the CEEC-3. We find that share prices increase with a depreciation of the domestic currency and only against the US Dollar in Russia, but decrease with a depreciation and only against the Euro in the CEEC-3. Such substantial differences may result from a differing dominance of exposure channels in the respective economies, such as the country-specific export structure and foreign debt. Finally, the switch from a pegged to a flexible exchange rate regime appears to be less important for exposure.
机译:本文分析了东欧最大的转型经济体(即俄罗斯和三个欧盟加入国)(到目前为止尚未解决)中出口公司的汇率风险。它也控制着不同汇率制度可能产生的影响。从现有文献中获得的结果大大改善了,我们发现样本中超过80%的公司存在显着的汇率风险。但是,企业风险敞口的大小和方向取决于特定的汇率,并且在俄罗斯和CEEC-3之间显然有所不同。我们发现在CEEC-3中,股价随本币贬值而上升,仅兑美元而上升,而贬值且仅兑欧元而下降。这种实质性差异可能是由于各个国家/地区在特定国家/地区的出口结构和外债等方面的敞口渠道主导地位不同而引起的。最后,从固定汇率制向灵活汇率制的转变对敞口似乎不太重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号