首页> 外文OA文献 >The Employer’s or the Employee’s Right to Choose? The Practical Effects of Escriba v. Foster Poultry Farms, Inc. on Employer Family and Medical Leave Policies in the Ninth Circuit

【2h】

The Employer’s or the Employee’s Right to Choose? The Practical Effects of Escriba v. Foster Poultry Farms, Inc. on Employer Family and Medical Leave Policies in the Ninth Circuit

机译：雇主或雇员的选择权？ Escriba诉Foster Poultry Farms，Inc.对第九巡回雇主家庭和病假政策的实际影响

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

40 pages

机译：40页

著录项

作者
Thompson Trisha;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
年度 2016
总页数
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 en_US
中图分类

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献

1. INTERPRETATION OF 'JOINT EMPLOYER' UNDER THE FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE ACT—NINTH CIRCUIT HOLDS AN AIRLINE THAT CONTRACTED WITH GROUNDS CREWS IS NOT A 'JOINT EMPLOYER' OF THOSE WORKERS UNDER THE FMLA: MOREAU V. AIR FRANCE [J] . Jennifer C. Wang Journal of Air Law and Commerce . 2005,第3期

机译：根据《家庭和医疗假法》解释“联合雇主” —在FMLA下，没有电路的人与地面工作人员约束的航空公司并非联合雇员：MOREAU V. AIR FRANCE
2. CONNECTICUT SUPREME COURT EXPANDS FAMILY MEDICAL LEAVE PROVISION REQUIRING EMPLOYERS TO ALLOW USE OF 'ACCUMULATED' PAID SICK LEAVE FOR FAMILY MEDICAL LEAVE [J] . Termination of Employment . 2007,第10期

机译：康涅狄格州最高法院扩大了家庭医疗假规定，要求用人单位允许将“累计”带薪病假用于家庭医疗假
3. LABOR LAW-TENTH CIRCUIT MISPERCEIVES AND MISAPPLIES THE PURPOSES OF THE FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE ACT, A DECISION LEAVING AIRLINE PILOTS WITHOUT THE ACT'S PROTECTIONS: KNAPP V. AMERICA WEST AIRLINES, INC. [J] . Jeff Orkin Journal of Air Law and Commerce . 2008,第1期

机译：劳工法第十条电路误导和误导了《家庭和医疗假法》的目的，没有该法令的决定引诱航空公司的飞行员：KNAPP V. AMERICA WEST AIRLINES，INC。
4. An analysis of the United States Supreme Court and the United States Courts of Appeals decisions on the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993: Their interpretations of the act as a tool for proper implementation of the act by employers. [D] . Stoddard, Mary Ann Whitlock. 2006

机译：对美国最高法院和美国上诉法院关于1993年《家庭和医疗假法》的裁决的分析：他们对该法案的解释是雇主正确执行该法案的工具。
5. Constitutional Law—State Employees Have Private Cause of Action against Employers under Family and Medical Leave Act—Nevada Department of Human Resources v. Hibbs, 538 U.S. 721 (2003). [O] . Teninbaum Gabriel H. 2004

机译：宪法（根据《家庭和医疗假法》，州雇员对雇主有私人诉权），内华达州人力资源部诉希布斯诉538 U.S. 721（2003年）。

The Employer’s or the Employee’s Right to Choose? The Practical Effects of Escriba v. Foster Poultry Farms, Inc. on Employer Family and Medical Leave Policies in the Ninth Circuit

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅