首页> 外文OA文献 >National trends and local delivery in old age mental health services: towards an evidence base: a mixed-methodology study of the balance of care approach, community mental health teams and specialist mental health outreach to care homes
【2h】

National trends and local delivery in old age mental health services: towards an evidence base: a mixed-methodology study of the balance of care approach, community mental health teams and specialist mental health outreach to care homes

机译:国家趋势和老年精神卫生服务在当地的提供:以证据为基础:混合方法研究,探讨护理方法,社区精神卫生小组和专门的精神卫生服务机构之间的平衡

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundudThe rising number of older people with mental health problems makes the effective use of mental health resources imperative. Little is known about the clinical effectiveness and/or cost-effectiveness of different service models.ududAimsudThe programme aimed to (1) refine and apply an existing planning tool [‘balance of care’ (BoC)] to this client group; (2) identify whether, how and at what cost the mix of institutional and community services could be improved; (3) enable decision-makers to apply the BoC framework independently; (4) identify variation in the structure, organisation and processes of community mental health teams for older people (CMHTsOP); (5) examine whether or not different community mental health teams (CMHTs) models are associated with different costs/outcomes; (6) identify variation in mental health outreach services for older care home residents; (7) scope the evidence on the association between different outreach models and resident outcomes; and (8) disseminate the research findings to multiple stakeholder groups.ududMethodsudThe programme employed a mixed-methods approach including three systematic literature reviews; a BoC study, which used a systematic framework for choosing between alternative patterns of support by identifying people whose needs could be met in more than one setting and comparing their costs/outcomes; a national survey of CMHTs’ organisation, structure and processes; a multiple case study of CMHTs exhibiting different levels of integration encompassing staff interviews, an observational study of user outcomes and a staff survey; national surveys of CMHTs’ outreach activities and care homes. A planned randomised trial of depression management in care homes was removed at the review stage by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) prior to funding award.udResultsududBoC: Past studies exhibited several methodological limitations, and just two related to older people with mental health problems. The current study suggested that if enhanced community services were available, a substantial proportion of care home and inpatient admissions could be diverted, although only the latter would release significant monies. CMHTsOP: 60% of teams were considered multidisciplinary. Most were colocated, had a single point of access (SPA) and standardised assessment documentation. Evidence of the impact of particular CMHT features was limited. Although staff spoke positively about integration, no evidence was found that more integrated teams produced better user outcomes. Working in high-integration teams was associated with poor job outcomes, but other factors negated the statistical significance of this. Care home outreach: Typical services in the literature undertook some combination of screening (less common), assessment, medication review, behaviour management and training, and evidence suggested intervention can benefit depressed residents. Care home staff were perceived to lack necessary skills, but relatively few CMHTs provided formal training.ududLimitationsudLimitations include a necessary reliance on observational rather than experimental methods, which were not feasible given the nature of the services explored.ududConclusionsudBoC: Shifting care towards the community would require the growth of support services; clarification of extra care housing’s (ECH) role; timely responses to people at risk of psychiatric admission; and improved hospital discharge planning. However, the promotion of care at home will not necessarily reduce public expenditure. CMHTsOP: Although practitioners favoured integration, its goals need clarification. Occupational therapists (OTs) and social workers faced difficulties identifying optimal roles, and support workers’ career structures needed delineating. Care home outreach: Further CMHT input to build care home staff skills and screen for depression may be beneficial. Priority areas for further study include the costs and benefits for older people of age inclusive mental health
机译:背景 udt患有精神健康问题的老年人的数量不断增加,因此有效利用精神卫生资源势在必行。对于不同服务模型的临床有效性和/或成本效益知之甚少。 ud udAims ud该程序旨在(1)改进此客户并应用现有的计划工具['护理平衡'(BoC)]。组; (2)确定是否,如何以及以何种成本改善机构和社区服务的混合; (3)使决策者能够独立应用BoC框架; (4)确定老年人社区心理健康团队(CMHTsOP)的结构,组织和流程的差异; (5)检查不同的社区心理健康团队(CMHT)模型是否与不同的成本/结果相关联; (6)确定针对敬老院居民的心理健康外联服务的差异; (7)扩大有关不同推广模式与居民结果之间关联的证据范围; (8)将研究结果传播给多个利益相关者群体。 ud udMethods ud该程序采用了一种混合方法的方法,包括三个系统的文献综述; BoC的研究使用了系统的框架,通过识别可以在多个环境中满足需求的人员并比较其成本/结果,在其他支持方式之间进行选择;对CMHT的组织,结构和流程进行的全国调查; CMHT的多案例研究显示出不同程度的整合,包括员工访谈,对用户成果的观察性研究和员工调查; CMHT的外展活动和养老院的全国性调查。国立卫生研究院(NIHR)在评审阶段取消了计划中的护理院抑郁症治疗的随机试验,然后才获得资助。 udResults ud udBoC:过去的研究显示出几种方法学上的局限性,其中只有两项与有精神健康问题的老年人。当前的研究表明,如果能够提供增强的社区服务,则可以将相当一部分护理院和住院病人转移,尽管只有后者会释放大量资金。 CMHTsOP:60%的团队被认为是多学科的。大多数都位于同一地点,只有一个访问点(SPA)和标准化的评估文档。有关特定CMHT功能影响的证据有限。尽管员工对集成度持肯定态度,但没有证据表明集成度更高的团队会产生更好的用户结果。在高集成度的团队中工作与不良的工作成果相关,但其他因素否定了这一点的统计意义。护理院外联:文献中的典型服务是筛查(较不常见),评估,药物复查,行为管理和培训的某种组合,证据表明干预可以使抑郁的居民受益。护理之家的工作人员被认为缺乏必要的技能,但是提供正式培训的CMHT相对较少。 udConclusions udBoC:向社区转移护理将需要支持服务的增长;澄清额外护理房屋(ECH)的作用;对有精神病住院风险的人及时作出反应;并改进了出院计划。但是,促进家庭护理并不一定会减少公共支出。 CMHTsOP:尽管从业者偏爱整合,但其目标尚需澄清。职业治疗师(OTs)和社会工作者在确定最佳角色时面临困难,需要确定工作者的职业结构。养老院服务范围:进一步的CMHT投入以建立养老院工作人员的技能和筛查抑郁症可能是有益的。有待进一步研究的重点领域包括老年人的包容性心理健康的成本和收益

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号