首页> 外文OA文献 >Contingent valuation versus choice experiments: Estimating the benefits of environmentally sensitive areas in Scotland
【2h】

Contingent valuation versus choice experiments: Estimating the benefits of environmentally sensitive areas in Scotland

机译:权变与选择实验:估算苏格兰环境敏感地区的收益

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper reports results from a study of the economic value of the conservation benefits of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) in Scotland. The main novelty of the approach taken is in comparing two direct valuation methods, namely contingent valuation and choice experiments, to value these benefits. The Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) is well-established as a technique for valuing the sorts of landscape and wildlife enhancements associated with ESAs. The CVM experiment reported here uses a dichotomous choice format, and includes a new correction for part-whole bias. Choice experiments are much less used as an environmental valuation technique. We note several advantages of such experiments over CVM, and then report characteristic values and 'programme values' estimated using the method. This application brings to light some problems in applying the choice experiment method. Finally, we discuss the issue of benefits transfer in the context of these two approaches to valuation.udud
机译:本文报告的结果来自对苏格兰环境敏感区(ESA)保护利益的经济价值的研究。所采用方法的主要新颖之处在于比较了两种直接评估方法,即或有评估和选择实验,以评估这些收益。或有评估法(CVM)是一种完善的技术,可用于评估与ESA相关的景观和野生动植物的增值。此处报告的CVM实验使用二分法选择格式,并且包括对部分整体偏差的新校正。选择实验很少用作环境评估技术。我们注意到此类实验相对于CVM的几个优势,然后报告使用该方法估算的特征值和“程序值”。该应用程序揭示了应用选择实验方法时的一些问题。最后,我们在这两种评估方法的背景下讨论了利益转移的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号