首页> 外文OA文献 >A failure to protect in peacekeeping operations: a commander’s responsibility? Obligations and responsibilities of military commanders in UN peacekeeping operations
【2h】

A failure to protect in peacekeeping operations: a commander’s responsibility? Obligations and responsibilities of military commanders in UN peacekeeping operations

机译:维持和平行动未能保护:指挥官的责任?联合国维持和平行动中军事指挥官的义务和责任

摘要

Inaction by UN peacekeeping troops in the face of the commission of genocide in Srebrenica and Kigali raised significant questions regarding the duty owed by UN peacekeeping forces to those under their protection. Recent court judgments have recognised that the Netherlands and Belgium were to a certain extent legally responsible to protect those under the care of each state’s peacekeeping troops, and that also the role of individual peacekeeping commanders may be questioned. While peacekeeping commanders may have a moral responsibility to act, it is not realistic to argue that peacekeeping commanders have a legal duty to do so. As a result, the use of the existing options to establish criminal liability for a failure to act under domestic and international law would not be justified in relation to the conduct committed.ududThis thesis argues that alternative options to the existing forms of criminal responsibility for military commanders should be considered, possibly focusing more clearly on failing to fulfil a norm of protection that is specific to peacekeeping and distinct from protective obligations under international human rights law and international humanitarian law. Establishing law tailored to the context of peacekeeping would be an important step towards clarification of the obligations and responsibilities held by military commanders in UN peacekeeping missions.
机译:联合国维和部队面对在斯雷布雷尼察和基加利发生的种族灭绝行径时不采取行动,这对联合国维和部队对受其保护的人员应负的义务提出了重大问题。最近的法院判决已经承认,荷兰和比利时在一定程度上负有法律责任保护在每个州的维和部队的照料下的人员,而且个别维和指挥官的作用也可能受到质疑。尽管维持和平指挥官可能负有采取行动的道义责任,但争论维持和平指挥官有法律义务这样做是不现实的。结果,就所犯的行为而言,使用现有的选择权为未能根据国内法和国际法行事而确立刑事责任将是不合理的。 ud ud本论文认为,对于现有的刑事形式的替代选择应该考虑对军事指挥官的责任,可能更明确地侧重于未能履行针对维持和平的保护规范,这不同于国际人权法和国际人道主义法规定的保护义务。制定适合于维和背景的法律,将是澄清联合国维和特派团军事指挥官所承担的义务和责任的重要一步。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sprik Lenneke H.M.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号