首页> 外文OA文献 >The Editorial Double Vision of Maxwell Perkins: How the Editor of Fitzgerald, Hemingway, and Wolfe Plied His Craft
【2h】

The Editorial Double Vision of Maxwell Perkins: How the Editor of Fitzgerald, Hemingway, and Wolfe Plied His Craft

机译:麦克斯韦·珀金斯的社论双重视野:菲茨杰拉德,海明威和沃尔夫的编辑如何发挥自己的才能

摘要

Scholars and literary enthusiasts have struggled for decades to account for editor Maxwell Perkins’s unparalleled success in facilitating the careers of many of the early twentieth century’s most enduring and profitable writers, among them F. Scott Fitzgerald, Ernest Hemingway, and Thomas Wolfe. This study seeks to penetrate that mystery by dissecting Perkins’s editorial practice and examining how he navigated the competing tensions between commercial success and aesthetic integrity in various circumstances. At play in the construction of his literary legacy are prevailing perceptions of authorship, complex interpersonal relationships, and the inherent battle between art and commerce. Focusing on his day-to-day activities, it is apparent that Perkins was guided by a unique editorial double vision—the propensity to appreciate the aesthetic experience while retaining the critical detachment necessary to appraise a literary work from a commercial standpoint—when solving the paradoxical dilemmas inherent in modern publishing.
机译:数十年来,学者和文学发烧友一直在努力争取编辑Maxwell Perkins在促进二十世纪初期许多最持久和最赚钱的作家的职业发展方面取得的无与伦比的成功,其中包括F. Scott Fitzgerald,Ernest Hemingway和Thomas Wolfe。这项研究试图通过剖析珀金斯的编辑实践,并研究他在各种情况下如何克服商业成功与美学完整性之间的竞争张力,来渗透这一谜团。在他的文学传承的构建过程中,普遍存在着对作者身份的理解,复杂的人际关系以及艺术与商业之间的内在斗争。专注于他的日常活动,很明显,珀金斯受到了独特的编辑双重视野的引导-在欣赏审美经验的同时,保留了从商业角度评价文学作品所必需的批判性工作的倾向-当解决现代出版业固有的矛盾困境。

著录项

  • 作者

    Van Hart Rachel F;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号