首页> 外文OA文献 >Variation between manufacturers’ declared vibration emission values and those measured under simulated workplace conditions for a range of hand-held power tools typically found in the construction industry
【2h】

Variation between manufacturers’ declared vibration emission values and those measured under simulated workplace conditions for a range of hand-held power tools typically found in the construction industry

机译:制造商声明的振动排放值与在模拟工作场所条件下针对建筑行业中常见的一系列手持式电动工具测得的值之间的差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Tool manufacturers are required to declare the vibration emission of their hand-held powerudtools in order to sell them within Europe. To enable comparison between differentudmanufacturers, tests are carried out in accordance with the relevant test code (such as thoseuddefined in the ISO 8662 and EN 60745 series). These tests may be carried out in artificialudcircumstances which do not necessarily correctly predict the vibration emission that would beudobtained in the workplace and often underestimate the magnitude of the vibration. In practice,udtools are used with a range of inserted tools on different materials, resulting in a range ofudvibration emission values for a given tool. CEN Technical Report, CEN/TR 15350 providesudmultiplication factors to enable an estimate of the workplace vibration emission to be obtainedudfrom the manufacturers’ data. This paper compares the manufacturers’ declared vibration emission values with thoseudmeasured for the public-domain OPERC HAVTEC database. The OPERC measurements haveudbeen made according to ISO 5349 using simulated workplace conditions, with a range ofudinserted tools for each machine tested. A total of 656 tool/attachment combinations areudpresented from 105 different tool models, covering a wide range of applications typically foundudwithin the construction industry. The measured data is compared with the manufacturersuddeclared emission value, with and without the multiplication factors given in CEN/TR 15350.udIt was found that, in general, the manufacturers’ declared values underestimated the workplaceudvibration emission, whereas the multiplication factors given in CEN/TR 15350 overestimatedudthe workplace vibration emission.
机译:要求工具制造商声明其手持式电动工具的振动辐射,以便在欧洲销售。为了能够在不同的制造商之间进行比较,按照相关的测试代码(例如ISO 8662和EN 60745系列中的 ud)进行测试。这些测试可能在人为的情况下进行,这种情况不一定正确地预测在工作场所会产生的振动辐射,并且常常低估了振动的幅度。实际上, udtools与在不同材料上的一系列插入工具一起使用,从而导致给定工具的一系列 udm振动发射值。 CEN技术报告,CEN / TR 15350提供了 udmultiplication因数,以便可以根据制造商的数据估算工作场所的振动排放。本文将制造商声明的振动排放值与为公有领域OPERC HAVTEC数据库测得的振动排放值进行比较。根据ISO 5349使用模拟的工作场所条件进行了OPERC测量,为每台被测试的机器配备了一系列插入工具。从105种不同的工具模型中总共显示了656种工具/附件组合,涵盖了建筑行业通常发现的广泛应用。将测得的数据与制造商的未声明的排放值进行比较,并带有或不包含CEN / TR 15350中给出的倍增系数。 ud发现,通常,制造商的声明值低估了工作场所的排放量,而乘积CEN / TR 15350中给出的因素高估了工作场所的振动排放。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号