首页> 外文OA文献 >Reading as Act of Queer Love: The Role of Intimacy in the “Readerly” Contract
【2h】

Reading as Act of Queer Love: The Role of Intimacy in the “Readerly” Contract

机译:作为酷爱的行为而读书:亲密关系在“读书”契约中的作用

摘要

The following paper has been revised from my 2001 MA thesis, which asked ‘Is it possible to define a strategy for reading queer?’ This includes an investigation of how the traditionally stable categories of reader/text/author may be redefined by queer strategies that instead force instability and flux. In the three years that have elapsed since first conceiving of this piece, I argue that the potential of queer reading is still one that has not been adequately explored. As I acknowledge, ‘whilst the queer does flag the fluctuating nature of sexual identity… it may also be used to unpack broader patterns of knowledge’ including those that give structure and meaning to our readerly imaginations.This paper concentrates especially on the ability of the queer to skew our hegemonic definitions of intimacy, moving from the dualistic self/other into the additive space conjured by queer theorists such as Eve Sedgwick and foregrounded by earlier feminist positions, such as the ‘placental economy’ of Rouch and Irigaray. Broadly speaking, what do such revised notions of intimacy do to the concept of ‘reading’ and how do they reconfigure the relationship ‘between things’ that reading involves? Key to my argument is the acknowledgement that ‘reading queer’ involves a radical rethinking of our ability to relate, and here I spend some time imagining what this revision may involve when figured through the lens of a queer liaison. It concludes by suggesting further starting points for investigation such as the positions of Lyotard and Butler, as well as indicating the queer readerly provocation which I suggest is apparent in Doane’s ‘lesbian post modern’.
机译:以下论文是根据我2001年的硕士论文修订的,该论文提出“是否可以定义阅读酷儿的策略?”,其中包括调查如何通过酷儿策略来重新定义传统上稳定的阅读者/文本/作者类别。而是强制不稳定和通量。自从首次构想这本书以来的三年中,我认为酷儿阅读的潜力仍然没有得到充分的探索。正如我所承认的那样,“虽然酷儿确实标志着性认同的不断变化……它也可能被用来解开更广泛的知识模式”,包括那些为我们的读者想象提供结构和意义的知识。渴望歪曲我们对霸权的霸权主义定义,从二元自我/他人进入由伊夫·塞奇威克(Eve Sedgwick)之类的同性恋理论家以及更早的女权主义者立场(例如鲁什(Rouch)和伊里格里(Irigaray)的“胎盘经济”)提出的加性空间。从广义上讲,这种经过修订的亲密关系对“阅读”的概念有什么作用,它们如何重新构造阅读所涉及的“事物之间”的关系?我的论点的关键是承认“阅读同志”涉及对我们建立联系的能力的彻底反思,在这里我花了一些时间来想像一下通过同志联系的角度来思考这一修订可能涉及的内容。最后,他提出了进一步的调查起点,例如Lyotard和Butler的职位,并指出了我认为在Doane的“现代女同性恋时代”中显而易见的读者挑衅。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ronald Lee;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号