首页> 外文OA文献 >Negligent investigation by police : can a duty of care be found using the existing negligence principles in Australia?
【2h】

Negligent investigation by police : can a duty of care be found using the existing negligence principles in Australia?

机译:警察的过失调查:是否可以使用澳大利亚现有的过失原则来确定谨慎的责任?

摘要

The Supreme Court of Canada, by majority, has found a tort of negligent investigation. The reasons for the decision were that there was a sufficiently close relationship between the investigating police officer and the particularized suspect for there to be a duty of care owed and there was no compelling policy reason why this duty of care should not be found. However it was decided that this duty of care was not breached. It will be considered in this paper whether courts can find a duty of care owed by police officers to suspects using the existing negligence principles in Australia, in accordance with the reasoning of the High Court in cases like Sullivan v Moody and Tame.
机译:大多数情况下,加拿大最高法院发现了一项过失调查侵权行为。作出此决定的原因是,在调查警务人员与特定嫌疑人之间存在足够密切的关系,以致应负有谨慎的责任,并且没有令人信服的政策理由不应当找到这种谨慎的责任。但是,决定不违反这一谨慎义务。根据高等法院在Sullivan诉Moody和Tame等案件中的推理,本文将考虑使用澳大利亚现有的过失原则,法院是否可以找到警务人员对嫌疑人应负的谨慎义务。

著录项

  • 作者

    Yule Jennifer M.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2008
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号