首页> 外文OA文献 >Ethical decision making and health care managers : developing managerial profiles based on ethical frameworks and other influencing factors
【2h】

Ethical decision making and health care managers : developing managerial profiles based on ethical frameworks and other influencing factors

机译:道德决策和医疗保健经理:根据道德框架和其他影响因素制定管理简介

摘要

Whether the community is looking for “scapegoats” to blame, or seeking more radical and deeper causes, health care managers are in the firing line whenever there are woes in the health care sector. The public has a right to question whether ethics have much influence on the everyday decision making of health care managers. This thesis explores, through a series of published papers, the influence of ethics and other factors on the decision making of health care managers in Australia. Critical review of over 40 years of research on ethical decision making has revealed a large number of influencing factors, but there is a demonstrable lack of a multidimensional approach that measures the combined influences of these factors on managers. This thesis has developed an instrument, the Managerial Ethical Profile (MEP) scale, based on a multidimensional model combining a large number of influencing factors. The MEP scale measures the range of influences on individual managers, and describes the major tendencies by developing a number of empirical profiles derived from a hierarchical cluster analysis. The instrument was developed and refined through a process of pilot studies on academics and students (n=41) and small-business managers (n=41), and then was administered to the larger sample of health care managers (n=441). Results from this study indicate that Australian health care managers draw on a range of ethical frameworks in their everyday decision making, forming the basis of five MEPs (Knights, Guardian Angels, Duty Followers, Defenders, and Chameleons). Results from the study also indicate that the range of individual, organisational, and external factors that influence decision making can be grouped into three major clusters or functions. Cross referencing these functions and other demographic data to the MEPs provides analytical insight into the characteristics of the MEPs. These five profiles summarise existing strengths and weaknesses in managerial ethical decision making. Therefore identifying these profiles not only can contribute to increasing organisational knowledge and self-awareness, but also has clear implications for the design and implementation of ethics education and training in large scale organisations in the health care industry.
机译:无论社区是要责怪“替罪羊”,还是要寻找更激进和更深层次的根源,只要卫生保健部门有困难,卫生保健管理人员都将处于戒备状态。公众有权质疑道德操守是否会对医疗保健管理者的日常决策产生很大影响。本文通过一系列已发表的论文,探讨了道德操守和其他因素对澳大利亚卫生保健管理者决策的影响。对40多年有关道德决策的研究进行的严格审查发现了许多影响因素,但显然缺乏一种多维方法来衡量这些因素对管理者的综合影响。本文基于一个多维模型,结合了许多影响因素,开发了一种工具,即“管理道德规范”量表。 MEP量表测量对个人管理者的影响范围,并通过开发从分层聚类分析得出的许多经验概况来描述主要趋势。该工具是通过对学者和学生(n = 41)和小型企业管理者(n = 41)进行试点研究的过程而开发和完善的,然后被管理给更大范围的卫生保健管理者样本(n = 441)。这项研究的结果表明,澳大利亚的卫生保健管理人员在日常决策中会借鉴一系列道德框架,从而构成了五个MEP(骑士,守护天使,值班追随者,捍卫者和变色龙)的基础。该研究的结果还表明,影响决策的个人,组织和外部因素的范围可以分为三个主要类别或职能。将这些功能和其他人口统计数据交叉引用到MEP,可以提供对MEP特征的分析见解。这五个概要概述了管理道德决策中的现有优点和缺点。因此,识别这些档案不仅有助于提高组织的知识和自我意识,而且对卫生保健行业中大型组织的道德教育和培训的设计和实施具有明显的意义。

著录项

  • 作者

    Casali Gian Luca;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号