首页> 外文OA文献 >The Effect of auditor-provided non-audit services on auditor independence and Sarbanes-Oxley: What separates tax services from other non-audit services?
【2h】

The Effect of auditor-provided non-audit services on auditor independence and Sarbanes-Oxley: What separates tax services from other non-audit services?

机译:审计师提供的非审计服务对审计师独立性和Sarbanes-Oxley的影响:税收服务与其他非审计服务有何区别?

摘要

Objectives of the Study:The Sarbanes-Oxley Act prohibited a large number of individual auditor-provided non-audit services, which were seen to have a negative effect on auditor independence. Tax services were not included in the list, implying that the effects of these services should somehow differ from those of other consulting services. Research on all non-audit services however has yielded contradictory results. This study sets out to illustrate the possible effects of tax services using prior research on all services as a framework, and attempts to shed some light on the issue whether the effects of tax services actually are significantly different from those of the other non-audit services.Research Method and Data:The methods used in the paper follow the research of Frankel et al. (2002) which approaches independence concerns by examining whether strong economic bonds between auditor and client lead to opportunistic earnings management through the use of discretionary accruals. A modification to the method also allows a separate examination of auditor-provided tax services. The sample used in the models consists of financial statements from 2415 individual North American firms for the financial year 2010.Findings of the Study:This study provides heteroscedasticity-robust evidence that there is no statistically significant association between auditor-provided tax services and earnings management. The results are robust to differences in auditor fee composition, to the direction of earnings management as well as to audit client firm size. Since the goal of this paper and the methods used in it is not to measure possible knowledge spillovers, one can only speculate whether the absence of such an association could mean that there are no audit-quality improving knowledge spillovers retainable from the provision of tax services, or that the provision of tax services simply does not have an effect on auditor independence.
机译:研究目的:《萨班斯-奥克斯利法案》(Sarbanes-Oxley Act)禁止大量由审计师提供的非审计服务,这些服务被视为对审计师的独立性具有负面影响。税收服务未包括在列表中,这意味着这些服务的效果应与其他咨询服务有所不同。但是,对所有非审计服务的研究都产生了矛盾的结果。本研究着眼于以所有服务为框架的先前研究来说明税收服务的可能影响,并试图阐明税收服务的影响是否实际上与其他非审计服务的影响显着不同的问题研究方法和数据:本文使用的方法遵循Frankel等人的研究。 (2002年),它通过检查审计师和客户之间强大的经济纽带是否通过使用酌情应计制导致机会主义的收益管理来解决独立性问题。对方法的修改还允许对审核员提供的税收服务进行单独检查。模型中使用的样本由来自2415家北美公司的2010财政年度的财务报表组成。研究结果:该研究提供了稳健的证据,证明审计师提供的税收服务与收益管理之间没有统计上的显着关联。结果对于审计师费用构成,收入管理方向以及审计客户公司规模方面的差异是有力的。由于本文的目的和本文中使用的方法不是要衡量可能的知识溢出,因此只能推测是否没有这种关联可能意味着没有提供税收服务可保留的审计质量提高知识溢出,或者提供税务服务根本不会影响审计师的独立性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Leino Lasse;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号