首页> 外文OA文献 >Uncovering the Institutions of Accountability Policy: Capturing the Institutions of Policymakers and Principals
【2h】

Uncovering the Institutions of Accountability Policy: Capturing the Institutions of Policymakers and Principals

机译:发现问责制的机构:捕获决策者和负责人的机构

摘要

Institutions are the heuristic building blocks of human interactions, or the rules that humans use to structure interaction in the social world. Institutions are both universal, meaning that all people possess them and use them, and institutions are also ever-changing and evolving to adapt to new situations and social dilemmas. This literature review in this study demonstrates the need to use Institutional Analysis in the field of educational policy research, and then establishes groundwork of Institutional literature. The research questions ask whether institutions can be captured, and if so what the institutions of accountability policy are. Accountability policy, specifically the rating system established under ESEA Flexibility, serves as the policy though which institutions are examined because of its complexity and omnipresence in education today. The findings suggest that institutions can be captured and that educators and policymakers are engaged in an institutional clash.
机译:制度是人类互动的启发式构建基石,或者是人类用来构建社会世界互动的规则。制度既具有普遍性,则意味着所有人都拥有并使用它们,而制度也在不断变化和发展以适应新的情况和社会困境。本研究的文献综述表明了在教育政策研究领域中使用制度分析的必要性,从而为制度文学奠定了基础。研究问题询问机构是否可以被俘获,问责制政策机构是什么。问责制政策,尤其是在ESEA灵活性下建立的评级系统,由于其在当今教育中的复杂性和无处不在而成为检查机构的政策。研究结果表明,可以抓住制度,而教育者和政策制定者则在制度上发生冲突。

著录项

  • 作者

    Mandel David Peter;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_US
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号