首页> 外文OA文献 >Environmentalizing Indigeneity: A Comparative Ethnography on Multiculturalism, Ethnic Hierarchies, and Political Ecology in the Colombian Amazon
【2h】

Environmentalizing Indigeneity: A Comparative Ethnography on Multiculturalism, Ethnic Hierarchies, and Political Ecology in the Colombian Amazon

机译:土著化环境:哥伦比亚亚马逊地区多元文化,民族等级和政治生态学的比较民族志

摘要

This dissertation is aimed at analyzing how ethnic hierarchies question the environmentalization of indigeneity, which is the foundation of the Colombian state's multicultural policy. In particular, the dissertation develops a comparative ethnographic approach to the way in which the "multicultural turn" of 1991 impacted three indigenous communities located at San José del Guaviare, a colonization frontier in the Colombian Amazon: the Nükak, the Jiw and the Tucano. Against the assumption of multicultural policy that indigenous communities form a vast mass of people radically diferent from mainstream (even portrayed as anti-modern), in San José there is an unequal distribution of the Nükak, Jiw and Tucano in different positions inside local ethnic hierarchies. For some, Nükak incarnate what Hale (2004) label as a "good ethnicity", that serves to promote Guaviare as an eco-touristic destination, the Jiw are a "bad ethnicity" that annoys White people in San José, while the Tucano are portrayed as "civilized Indians". Thus, the dissertation states how these ethnic hierarchies contradict some of the core assumptions of multicultural policies that are based on an essentialized understanding of indigenous peoples as "ecologically noble savages." The dissertation argues that the analysis of contemporary experiences on indigeneity in an Amazonian context such as San José, could be better understood if it observes a set of processes and actors including: the historical transformation of senses on otherness, the production of forests as a field of domain under state regulations, the economic crossroads affecting indigenous peoples on their "resguardos" (indigenous lands) and the intervention of state laws, NGOs, indigenous political organizations, settlers, foreign governments and state officials. The analysis of such a variety of processes and actors shaping contemporary experiences on indigeneity in the Colombian Amazon follows the environmentality approach (Agrawal, 2005). From that perspective, I discuss the following ideas: a) indigenous resguardos were designed as governmentalized localities in multicultural policy to regulate and control how indigenous peoples manage natural resources; b) those communities portrayed as followers of the ecological nobility script act as regulatory communities; c) the technologies for governing the ecological realm do not necessarily assure the formation of environmental subjectivities.
机译:本文旨在分析种族等级制度如何质疑本土化的环境化,这是哥伦比亚州多元文化政策的基础。尤其是,论文针对1991年的“多元文化转向”对位于哥伦比亚亚马逊河沿岸殖民地SanJosédel Guaviare的三个土著社区(努卡克,犹太人和托卡诺)的影响发展了一种比较人种学的方法。在多元文化政策的假设下,土著社区构成了与主流群体根本不同的人口(甚至被描绘成反现代的),在圣何塞,努卡克人,犹太人和图卡诺人在当地族裔等级制中的不同位置分布不均。对于某些人而言,努卡克(Nükak)体现了黑尔(Hale(2004))所称的“好民族”,旨在促进瓜维阿雷成为生态旅游目的地,而犹太人(Jiw)是一种“坏民族”,惹恼了圣何塞的白人,而图卡诺(Tucano)被描绘成“文明的印第安人”。因此,本文阐述了这些种族等级如何与多元文化政策的一些核心假设相矛盾,这些假设基于对土著人民的本质理解为“生态上的野蛮人”。论文认为,如果它观察到一系列过程和行为者,包括对异性的历史性转变,作为现场的森林生产,就可以更好地理解在诸如圣何塞之类的亚马逊环境中对当代土著人经验的分析。在国家法规的管辖范围之内,影响土著人民“ resguardos”(土著土地)的经济十字路口以及州法律,非政府组织,土著政治组织,定居者,外国政府和州官员的干预。对构成哥伦比亚亚马逊土著社区当代经验的各种过程和参与者的分析遵循了环境方法(Agrawal,2005)。从这个角度出发,我讨论以下想法:a)土著文物保护团被设计为多元文化政策中的政府化地方,以规范和控制土著人民如何管理自然资源; b)被描绘成生态贵族脚本追随者的那些社区充当监管社区; c)治理生态领域的技术并不一定确保形成环境主体性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号