首页> 外文OA文献 >AN EVALUATION OF THE LEVEL OF SKILL REQUIRED OF OPERATORS OF A COMPUTER-ASSISTED RADIOLOGIC TOTAL LUNG CAPACITY MEASUREMENT SYSTEM (RELIABILITY, VALIDITY).
【2h】

AN EVALUATION OF THE LEVEL OF SKILL REQUIRED OF OPERATORS OF A COMPUTER-ASSISTED RADIOLOGIC TOTAL LUNG CAPACITY MEASUREMENT SYSTEM (RELIABILITY, VALIDITY).

机译:计算机辅助放射性总肺活量测量系统(可靠性,有效性)的操作员所需技能水平的评估。

摘要

This research was conducted to obtain information regarding the feasibility of using non-medical personnel to obtain measurements of radiologic total lung capacity (TLC). Operators from each of four groups (general undergraduates, nursing students, medical students, radiologists) differing in the amount of medical training and/or experience reading x-rays, performed each of two tasks. The first task was the measurement of radiologic TLC for a set of twenty x-rays. The second task consisted of tracing the outline of the anatomical structures that must be identified in the execution of the radiologic TLC measurement task. Data from the radiologic TLC measurement task were used to identify possible group differences in the reliability and validity of the measures. The reliability analyses were performed within the framework of Generalizability Theory. While the results are not conclusive, due to small sample sizes, the analyses suggest that group differences in reliability of the measures, if they exist, are small. The concurrent validity of the measures was assessed by obtaining, for each experience level, the correlation between the group mean radiologic TLC for a film set and the TLC for that patient, obtained from a body plethysmograph. Only small differences in the group correlation coefficients were observed. A liberal test of these differences indicated they were not statistically significant. Additionally, two experience level by film sets ANOVAs were performed to determine possible group differences in how well the actual magnitudes of the radiologic TLC measures approximated those obtained with the body plethysmograph. These analyses indicated that the magnitude of the differences between radiologic and plethysmographic TLC measures were smaller for the undergraduates than for the nursing students and radiologists. Lastly, a number of analyses of the anatomical structure tracings were performed. Few interpretable group differences were found.
机译:进行这项研究是为了获得有关使用非医务人员进行放射总肺活量(TLC)测量的可行性的信息。来自四个组(普通大学生,护理学生,医科学生,放射科医师)的操作员,其医疗培训和/或阅读X射线的经验各不相同,分别执行了两项任务。第一项任务是测量20条X射线的放射线TLC。第二项任务是跟踪在执行放射学TLC测量任务时必须确定的解剖结构的轮廓。放射学TLC测量任务中的数据用于确定测量的可靠性和有效性中可能存在的组差异。可靠性分析是在概化理论的框架内进行的。尽管结果不确定,但由于样本量小,分析表明,如果存在,则各组措施的可靠性差异很小。通过获取每个经验水平的胶片集的组平均放射线TLC与该患者的TLC(从人体体积描记仪获得)之间的相关性,可以评估这些措施的同时有效性。小组相关系数只有很小的差异。对这些差异的自由检验表明,它们在统计上不显着。此外,还进行了两个经验水平的胶片ANOVA测试,以确定放射线TLC测量的实际量值与人体体积描记仪获得的量值近似程度的可能组差异。这些分析表明,本科生放射线和体积描记薄层扫描测量之间差异的幅度小于护理学生和放射线医师。最后,进行了许多解剖结构示踪分析。几乎没有可解释的群体差异。

著录项

  • 作者

    MAZZEO JOHN.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1985
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号