首页> 外文OA文献 >A COMPARISON OF SKILLS TRAINING PLUS COGNITIVE RESTRUCTURING, SKILLS TRAINING ONLY, COGNITIVE RESTRUCTURING ONLY, AND NO SYSTEMATIC TREATMENT IN THE REDUCTION OF 'TRAIT-LIKE' COMMUNICATION APPREHENSION IN THE CLASSROOM SETTING
【2h】

A COMPARISON OF SKILLS TRAINING PLUS COGNITIVE RESTRUCTURING, SKILLS TRAINING ONLY, COGNITIVE RESTRUCTURING ONLY, AND NO SYSTEMATIC TREATMENT IN THE REDUCTION OF 'TRAIT-LIKE' COMMUNICATION APPREHENSION IN THE CLASSROOM SETTING

机译:减少班级背景中“特质”沟通的技巧的比较:技能训练加认知重构,仅技能训练,仅认知重构和没有系统性处理

摘要

The purpose of this experiment was to determine which of the communication apprehension reduction methods currently available was most effective in classroom application. This contextual concern was a critical factor. Communication apprehension reduction methods not readily applicable to classroom environments were eliminated as viable treatment methods. Treatment methods (independent variables) tested in this experiment were: skills training plus cognitive restructuring, skills training only, cognitive restructuring only, and a no systematic treatment (control) group. Each of these treatments was reviewed. Nonapplicable treatment methods for classroom environments were also reviewed. Subjects were randomly chosen and assigned to one of the four experimental conditions. Three introspective self-report instruments measuring communication apprehension were employed as dependent measures. Level of communication apprehension was the dependent variable. Attempts to control a number of extraneous variables in this quasi-experimental design were made. Composite scores were made for each subject on pre-test and post-test measures, and "Difference" (D) scores were computed from these composite scores. These D scores were submitted to three sets of statistical analyses: a one-way analysis of variance, an analysis of co-variance, and an analysis of co-variance using only those subjects with pre-test composite scores falling above the marginal mean score. In addition, homogeneity of variance tests were run on experimental group variances, and correlation coefficients were computed for each of the six dependent measures (three instruments with one of these instruments having four sub-scales). Also, three sets of Dunnett's tests for comparisons of treatment groups to a control group were made. The results indicated that no significant differences occurred between any of the four experimental conditions tested. Results of the Dunnett's tests indicated that skills training plus cognitive restructuring was the most effective treatment method of those methods tested. Specifically, significant changes in level of communication apprehension occurred from pre-test to post-test trials when only those subjects above the marginal mean score were used. Based on the findings reported, instructors were recommended to use skills training plus cognitive restructuring as a communication apprehension reduction technique in classroom environments. The author also recommended that skills training plus cognitive restructuring be employed only with those students experiencing a moderate or high level of communication apprehension.
机译:本实验的目的是确定当前可用的哪种减少沟通恐惧感的方法在课堂应用中最有效。这种与环境有关的关注是一个关键因素。减少不适用于教室环境的减少沟通忧虑的方法已被删除为可行的治疗方法。在该实验中测试的治疗方法(独立变量)为:技能训练加认知重建,仅技能训练,仅认知重建和无系统治疗(对照组)组。这些治疗中的每一个都进行了审查。还回顾了教室环境中不适用的治疗方法。随机选择受试者并将其分配到四个实验条件之一。运用三种内省的自我报告工具来衡量沟通的忧虑,作为依存措施。沟通理解水平是因变量。试图控制这种准实验设计中的许多无关的变量。在测试前和测试后对每个受试者进行综合评分,并从这些综合评分中计算出“差异”(D)分数。将这些D分数提交给三组统计分析:单向方差分析,协方差分析以及仅使用那些测试前综合得分低于边际均值得分的受试者进行协方差分析。另外,对实验组的方差进行方差检验的同质性,并针对六个相关量度(三个量度,其中一个量度有四个分量表)计算了相关系数。另外,进行了三组邓尼特检验,用于比较治疗组和对照组。结果表明,在所测试的四个实验条件中的任何一个之间都没有发生显着差异。 Dunnett的测试结果表明,技能培训加上认知重构是这些测试方法中最有效的治疗方法。具体而言,当仅使用高于平均得分的那些受试者时,从测试前到测试后的沟通理解水平发生了显着变化。根据报告的发现,建议教师在课堂环境中使用技能培训和认知重构作为减少沟通的技术。作者还建议,仅对那些具有中等或较高水平的交流理解的学生进行技能培训和认知重建。

著录项

  • 作者

    Taugher Charles David;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1981
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_US
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号