首页> 外文OA文献 >Sons, Lovers And The Laius Complex In Russian Modernist Poetry
【2h】

Sons, Lovers And The Laius Complex In Russian Modernist Poetry

机译:俄国现代派诗歌中的儿子,情人和劳厄斯情结

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In this introduction to the articles written by Jenifer Presto and Stuart Goldberg that focus on the psychosocial tensions between Russian modernist poets of slightly different generations, Sibelan Forrester explores the distinct options of filiation and affiliation as ways to imagine or describe poetic choices, modeling textual relationships on the familial or genetic, with the interest in personal psychology characteristic of the period. These modes of thinking are reflected in creative writing, diary entries or poetry, as well as in scholarship. The anticarnal bent of Russian symbolists, particularly of Aleksandr Blok, springs from the religious philosophy of the time. Imagining poetic creation as maternity turns out to be less threatening-at least, for a male poet-than treating it as paternity, which raises other concerns too close to home. Both Presto and Goldberg suggest that Blok rightly considered the Acmeists, especially Osip Mandelu27shtam, a threat to his own poetic intentions.
机译:在詹妮弗·普雷斯托(Jenifer Presto)和斯图尔特·戈德堡(Stuart Goldberg)撰写的文章的介绍中,他们着重介绍了几代不同的俄罗斯现代主义诗人之间的社会心理张力,西贝兰·佛雷斯特(Sibelan Forrester)探索了孝顺和从属关系的不同选择,作为想象或描述诗意选择,模拟文本关系的方式对家庭或遗传有兴趣的,对那个时期的个人心理特征感兴趣。这些思维方式反映在创造性写作,日记条目或诗歌以及奖学金中。俄国象征主义者,尤其是亚历山大·勃洛克(Aleksandr Blok)的反腐倾向源于当时的宗教哲学。想象一下,对于母性而言,诗歌创作的威胁性至少要比男性父子低,至少对于男性诗人而言,威胁要小得多,这引起了其他离家很近的担忧。普雷斯托(Presto)和戈德堡(Goldberg)都建议布洛克(Blok)正确地认为Acmeists,特别是Osip Mandel u27shtam,对他自己的诗意意图构成了威胁。

著录项

  • 作者

    Forrester Sibelan E.S.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2004
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号