首页> 外文OA文献 >A COMPARATIVE STUDY IN TEACHING READING NARRATIVE TEXT BY USING PQ4R (PREVIEW, QUESTION, READ, REFLECT, RECITE, REVIEW) AND KWL (KNOW – WANT – LEARN) STRATEGY AT SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMPN 1 SUMBERGEMPOL TULUNGAGUNG IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR 2015/2016
【2h】

A COMPARATIVE STUDY IN TEACHING READING NARRATIVE TEXT BY USING PQ4R (PREVIEW, QUESTION, READ, REFLECT, RECITE, REVIEW) AND KWL (KNOW – WANT – LEARN) STRATEGY AT SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMPN 1 SUMBERGEMPOL TULUNGAGUNG IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR 2015/2016

机译:在2015年度SMPN 1 SUMBERGEMPOL TULUNGAGUNG的第二年级学生中使用PQ4R(预审,问题,阅读,反映,背诵,复习)和KWL(知道-想-学习)策略进行叙事文本的比较研究。

摘要

ABSTRACTudPratiwi, Malita Dani. Registered Number Student. 2813123102. A Comparative Study in Teaching Reading Narrative Text by Using PQ4R (Preview, Question, Read, Reflect, Recite, Review) and KWL (Know – Want – Learn) Strategy at Second Year Students of SMPN 1 Sumbergempol Tulungagung in the Academic Year 2015/2016. Thesis. English Education Department. State Islamic Institute (IAIN) Tulungagung. Advisor: Nanik Sri Rahayu M.Pd.udKeywords: PQ4R (Preview, Question, Read, Reflect, Recite and Review) strategy, KWL (Know – Want – Learnt) strategy, reading comprehension, narrative textudReading is one of the important skills in English that has to be mastered. Reading becomes a major upon teaching and learning process and important tool for academic success. Reading skill must be owned by the students in order to they can achieve successful in their academic process. It is due to most of teaching and learning material in written form. Therefore, the students have to improve their reading ability in comprehending the text. To improve the students’ ability in comprehending the text there are some strategies that can be used by the teacher. In this study, two of the strategies used in teaching reading are PQ4R (Preview, Question, Read, Reflect, Recite and Review) and KWL (Know – Want – Learnt) and then the result of two strategies above will be compared.udThe formulation of research problem was : 1) Which one is more effective between Preview, Question, Read, Reflect, Recite, Review (PQ4R) or Know- Want- Learn (KWL) in teaching reading to improve the students achievement in reading comprehension of narrative text?ududThe purpose of this study was to know Which one is more effective between Preview, Question, Read, Reflect, Recite, Review (PQ4R) or Know- Want- Learn (KWL) in teaching reading to improve the students achievement in reading comprehension of narrative text.ududResearch method: 1) the research design in this study was comparative design with quantitative approach, 2)The population of this study was all students of second year at SMPN 1 Sumbergempol Tulungagung, 3) The sample were VIII A class consists of 30 students and VIII D class consists of 30 class, 4) the research instrument was test, 5) the data analysis was using T test.ududThe result showed that the students’ mean score taught by using PQ4R (Preview, Question, Read, Reflect, Recite and Review) was 83,16 while, the students’ mean score taught using KWL (Know – Want – Learnt) was 78,33. The tcount was 2,413. It was higher than ttable at 5% significant level. In the 5% level, the value was 2,000. It can be seen that 2,413 2,000. It means that Ho is rejected, so there were significant different score between those taught by using PQ4R and KWL strategy. In other word, by comparing the means it can be concluded that PQ4R strategy is more effective than KWL strategy in teaching reading narrative text at second year students of SMPN 1 Sumbergempol Tulungagung in the academic year 2015/2016.
机译:摘要 udPratiwi,玛丽塔·丹妮(Malita Dani)。注册号学生。 2813123102.在2015学年SMPN 1 Sumbergempol Tulungagung的二年级学生通过使用PQ4R(预览,提问,阅读,反思,背诵,复习)和KWL(知道–想要–学习)策略阅读叙事文本的比较研究。 / 2016。论文。英语教育系。国立伊斯兰学院(IAIN)图隆贡。顾问:Nanik Sri Rahayu M.Pd. ud关键字:PQ4R(预览,提问,阅读,反映,背诵和复习)策略,KWL(知道–想要–学习)策略,阅读理解力,叙述性文字 ud阅读是其中之一必须掌握的重要英语技能。阅读成为教学过程中的专业,是学术成功的重要工具。阅读技巧必须归学生所有,这样他们才能在学习过程中取得成功。这是由于大多数教学材料都是书面形式。因此,学生在阅读课文时必须提高阅读能力。为了提高学生理解课文的能力,老师可以使用一些策略。在这项研究中,用于阅读教学的两种策略是PQ4R(预习,提问,阅读,反思,背诵和复习)和KWL(知道–想要–学习),然后将比较以上两种策略的结果。 ud研究问题的表述为:1)在阅读教学中,预览,问题,阅读,反映,背诵,复习(PQ4R)或知识-学习-知识(KWL)之间哪个更有效,以提高学生的阅读理解能力 ud ud这项研究的目的是要了解在预习,提问,阅读,反思,背诵,复习(PQ4R)或知识学习(KWL)中,哪种方法在提高阅读能力方面更有效 ud ud研究方法:1)本研究的研究设计是采用定量方法的比较设计,2)本研究的人群均为SMPN二年级的所有学生1 Sumbergempol Tulungagung,3)样本为VIII A类,包括30名学生和VIII D级由30个班级组成,4)测试研究仪器,5)使用T检验进行数据分析。 ud ud结果显示,使用PQ4R进行教学的学生的平均分(Preview,Question,阅读,反思,背诵和复习)为83,16,而使用KWL(知道–想要–学习)的学生平均分数为78,33。总数为2,413。它比ttable高出5%的显着水平。在5%级别中,值为2,000。可以看到2,413 2,000。这意味着Ho被拒绝,因此使用PQ4R和KWL策略教的分数之间存在显着差异。换句话说,通过比较手段可以得出结论,在2015/2016学年SMPN 1 Sumbergempol Tulungagung的二年级学生中,PQ4R策略比KWL策略更有效地教授叙事文本阅读。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号