首页> 外文OA文献 >Digital Library Education: Some International Course Structure Comparisons
【2h】

Digital Library Education: Some International Course Structure Comparisons

机译:数字图书馆教育:一些国际课程结构比较

摘要

Digital Library Education (DLE) is assuming increasing importance and it is clear there is a pressing need from social trends and technology for educational developments in this new and fast moving area [1, 3]. Our latest review of progress in DLE and other recent studies [1, 2] pointed out that the number of library schools offering DL education is still growing. By the end of 2006 (based on modules titles shown on-line), 28% (5/18) of all universities with accredited programmes by CILIP (the Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals) in the UK and over 60% (34/56) of all library schools by ALA (American Library Association) in the USA and Canada are offering specific DL education. Around 40% of DLE is now either specialized independent or certificate programmes and courses, mainly in North America. However, there is currently no widely accepted formal curriculum framework for digital librarianship [2]. A major difficulty for academics in library and information science (LIS) is how to incorporate all of the DL technologies to their DLE, and no formal widely accepted framework of DLE has yet been established [1, 2, 3, 4]. It is difficult to compare full-scale independent programmes with other programmes that are more traditionally-based but which have modules on DLs [3, 4]. This and others recent studies [1, 2, 5] show there is a pressing need for educators to explore the specific question of what should be the standard framework for DLE in LIS to ensure that students and their employers – can be assured of having an adequate skill set to work confidently and productively in this area. DLE taught in a Computer Science environment benefits from an outline framework from CC2001 but no such framework has yet been promulgated from LIS based programmes [1, 2].
机译:数字图书馆教育(DLE)的重要性日益提高,很明显,在这个新的快速发展领域,社会趋势和技术对教育发展的迫切需求[1,3]。我们对DLE和其他最新研究进展的最新评论[1、2]指出,提供DL教育的图书馆学校的数量仍在增长。到2006年底(基于在线显示的模块标题),在英国所有获得CILIP(特许图书馆和信息专业人员学会)认可的课程的大学中,有28%(5/18)和超过60%(34 / 56)在美国和加拿大的ALA(美国图书馆协会)所有图书馆学校都提供特定的DL教育。现在,大约40%的DLE是专门的独立或证书课程,主要在北美。但是,目前还没有被广泛接受的数字图书馆管理的正式课程框架[2]。图书馆和信息科学(LIS)学者面临的主要困难是如何将所有DL技术整合到他们的DLE中,并且尚未建立正式的,被广泛接受的DLE框架[1,2,3,4]。很难将全面独立程序与其他基于传统程序但在DL上具有模块的程序进行比较[3,4]。该研究和其他近期研究[1、2、5]显示,迫切需要教育工作者探讨LIS中DLE的标准框架应该是什么的特定问题,以确保学生和他们的雇主能够得到保证。足够的技能来自信和富有成效地工作。在计算机科学环境中授课的DLE受益于CC2001的大纲框架,但尚未从基于LIS的程序中发布这样的框架[1、2]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号