首页> 外文OA文献 >'Towards a Positive Treaty Partnership in the Post-Settlement Era”: Treaty of Waitangi Settlements and Decolonisation in Aotearoa New Zealand
【2h】

'Towards a Positive Treaty Partnership in the Post-Settlement Era”: Treaty of Waitangi Settlements and Decolonisation in Aotearoa New Zealand

机译:“在定居后时代建立积极的条约伙伴关系”:新西兰奥特罗阿的《怀唐伊定居和非殖民化条约》

摘要

Settlements of historical Treaty of Waitangi claims present a unique opportunity to provide redress to Māori for the past and ongoing grievances committed by the Crown, and through that redress and the accompanying focus on improved relations, to decolonise the relationship between the two. Despite this opportunity, there is a wide body of literature that suggests the outcomes of these settlements instead will perpetuate colonisation and uphold the political structures which allow for the on-going dispossession of Māori.This thesis argues that existing Treaty settlement policy can be viewed as a continuation of the legacy of colonisation by stealth, entrenching the power of the colonial state while simultaneously offering redress and apologies for past grievances of the colonisation process which do not adequately challenge the underlying structures which give rise to those grievances. It is further argued, through the example of political rhetoric from the 2014 general election, that current political discourses support the implementation of colonising settlement policies and that those discourses reinforce notions of Western settler superiority.This thesis explores a number of perspectives on settlements and decolonisation which support the claim that historical Treaty settlements perpetuate rather than challenge colonisation. I argue that the pressing concern emerging from the thesis is that the Crown can be to seen to be directing the Treaty relationship to a post-settlement world where the negotiated outcomes of Treaty settlements and the parties to them are the end point of colonisation and represent the future dynamic of the Crown-Māori relationship.
机译:《怀唐伊条约》的历史和解主张的解决提供了一个难得的机会,可以向毛利人提供补救,以解决王室过去和目前正在进行的不满,并通过这种补救以及随之而来的对改善关系的关注,使两者之间的关系非殖民化。尽管有这样的机会,仍有大量文献表明这些定居点的结果将使殖民化永久化并维持允许毛利人持续被剥夺的政治结构。本论文认为,现有的条约定居点政策可以被视为通过隐身来延续殖民统治的遗产,巩固殖民国家的权力,同时为过去对殖民化进程的不满提供补救和道歉,而这些抱怨并没有充分挑战引起这些不满的基本结构。通过2014年大选的政治言论实例进一步论证说,当前的政治言论支持殖民定居政策的实施,并且这些言论强化了西方定居者优势的观念。本文探讨了关于定居和非殖民化的许多观点。这支持了历史性条约定居点是永久存在而不是挑战殖民的主张。我认为,从论文中得出的紧迫关切是,可以将英国视为将条约关系引向定居后的世界,在该世界中,条约定居点及其缔约各方的谈判结果是殖民的终点,并代表着皇冠毛利人关系的未来动力。

著录项

  • 作者

    Summerfield Scott;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_NZ
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号