首页> 外文OA文献 >War of words? A contrastive linguistic study of the political speeches of Adolf Hitler, Martin Luther King Jr., George W. Bush Jr. and Barack Obama, employing the ‘Wave Method of political speech analysis’
【2h】

War of words? A contrastive linguistic study of the political speeches of Adolf Hitler, Martin Luther King Jr., George W. Bush Jr. and Barack Obama, employing the ‘Wave Method of political speech analysis’

机译:口水战?对“阿道夫·希特勒,小马丁·路德·金,小乔治·W·布什和巴拉克·奥巴马的政治演说进行对比的语言学研究,采用了“政治演说分析的波动方法”

摘要

This Masters Thesis attempts to de-mystify political speeches and their impact on their intended audience by proposing a method for political speech analysis that is at once easily accessible, linear, and systematic. Much excellent research has been done in linguistic analysis of political speeches by the likes of Van Dijk (1998), with hisudemphasis of the ‘Us versus them’ strategy, as well as Charteris-Black (2005) with an insightful examination of metaphors in political speech. Seminal work by Faircloughud(1995) also points to the need of an analysis method of political speeches which takes into account the entire process of text creation and consumption.udThis Masters Thesis proposes both to incorporate these important pervious works in the results and analysis (section 4), as well as to elaborate on my own speech-writing experience to introduce an all-encompassing approach of political discourse analysis.udThis approach is both cross-disciplinary in its linguistic approach, drawing from bothudCritical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Linguistics, and easily accessible to a wider,udperhaps skeptical public who may find their doubts about the political speech processudreduced by a clear and insightful model for political speech analysis.udud
机译:本硕士论文试图通过提出一种既易于访问,又线性且系统化的政治演讲分析方法,来消除政治演讲及其对目标受众的影响的神秘性。范迪克(Van Dijk,1998)通过对“我们与他们的对立”策略的 demphasis,以及宪章-布莱克(2005),对隐喻进行了深刻的考察,在政治演讲的语言分析方面进行了许多出色的研究。在政治演讲中。 Fairclough ud(1995)的开创性工作还指出,需要一种政治言论分析方法,该方法要考虑到文本创建和使用的整个过程。 ud本硕士论文建议将这些重要的历来著作都纳入结果并分析(第4节),并详细阐述我自己的演讲写作经验,以引入一种全方位的政治话语分析方法。 ud这种方法在语言学方法上都是跨学科的,而这两种方法都来自 udCritical Discourse Analysis和认知语言学,并且更容易被广大怀疑的公众访问,他们可能会发现对政治演讲过程的怀疑被清晰而有见地的政治演讲分析模型所减少。 ud ud

著录项

  • 作者

    Krug Matthias;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号