首页> 外文OA文献 >Study on Stability of Pillars in Coal Mines through Empirical Models
【2h】

Study on Stability of Pillars in Coal Mines through Empirical Models

机译:通过经验模型研究煤矿柱的稳定性

摘要

Mining is the extraction of profitable minerals or other land materials from the earth, generally from a mineral body, vein or (coal) crease. Mining includes distinctive techniques like prospecting for metal bodies, dissecting the possibility of extraction, gainfulness of the operation, extraction of the sought materials. One of such systems is the Bord and Pillar system for mining which is one of the most established strategies for mining. The accomplishment of Bord and Pillar mining is selecting the ideal pillar size. In the event that the pillars are too expensive, then the extraction proportion abatements prompting less productivity and if the pillars are too little it jeopardizes the general mine wellbeing. Indian mines have around 60 % of the coal hindered as pillars. Geotechnical variables of an adjacent underground coal mine has been dead set in the research center. Distinctive methodologies of pillar configuration have been thought about. Variety of security element with width to stature proportion of pillar, extraction rate and profundity of spread has been dead set and conclusion has been made. The wellbeing and attainability of mining system is acquired through an ideal connection between security variable and extraction rate. This thesis contains the study of RK6 mine and GDK8 incline, the data collected from these mines and the results are found out to be 3.49MPa, 6.3MPa in RK6 and GDK8 respectively shows the maximum stress from Tributary area approach. Similarly 7.62MPa and 7.29MPa respectively for mine RK6 and GDK8 incline shows the maximum stress from Wilson’s approach. Wilson’s approach on stress over pillar shows maximum stress of. Strength of the pillars through six approaches indicated minimum strength of 11.17 MPa and 11.25 MPa in RK6 and GDK8 respectively. Safety factors are 2.11 and 2.3 for RK-6, and GDK 8 with variation of about 10% compared to the Tributary Area Approach. On the whole, pillars are stable with more than 1.5 safety factor for both of the mines conforming to the field observations
机译:采矿是从地球上,通常是从矿体,矿脉或(煤)折痕中提取有利可图的矿物或其他土地材料。采矿包括独特的技术,例如探查金属矿体,剖析开采的可能性,操作的收益性,所需材料的开采。这样的系统之一是Bord and Pillar采矿系统,它是最成熟的采矿策略之一。 Bord和Pillar采矿的成就正在选择理想的立柱尺寸。如果支柱太昂贵,那么开采比例的减少将导致生产率降低;如果支柱太少,则会危害矿山的总体福祉。印度矿山约有60%的煤炭被禁止作为支柱。研究中心已设定了相邻地下煤矿的岩土工程变量。已经考虑了支柱构造的独特方法。确定了各种安全元件,其宽度与柱子的高度比例,提取率和展开深度有关,并得出了结论。采矿系统的安全性和可达到性是通过安全变量和提取率之间的理想联系而获得的。本文对RK6矿山和GDK8矿山进行了研究,从这些矿山收集的数据表明,RK6矿山和GDK8矿山分别具有3.49MPa,6.3MPa的压力,表明支流地区方法产生的最大应力。同样,RK6矿山和GDK8矿山的斜度分别为7.62MPa和7.29MPa,显示了威尔逊进近的最大应力。威尔逊(Wilson)对支柱施加压力的方法显示出最大的应力。通过六种方法获得的支柱强度分别表明,RK6和GDK8中的最小强度分别为11.17 MPa和11.25 MPa。 RK-6和GDK 8的安全系数分别为2.11和2.3,与朝贡区方法相比,差异约为10%。总体而言,符合实地观察的两座矿山的支柱均稳定,安全系数超过1.5

著录项

  • 作者

    Sahu Balgopal;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号