首页> 外文OA文献 >Should I stay or should I go? Patient understandings of and responses to source-isolation practices,
【2h】

Should I stay or should I go? Patient understandings of and responses to source-isolation practices,

机译:我应该走还是留?患者对源隔离实践的理解和响应,

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Isolation of patients, who are colonised or infected with a multidrug-resistant organism (source-isolation), is a common practice in most acute health-care settings, to prevent transmission to other patients. Efforts to improve the efficacy of source-isolation in hospitals focus on healthcare staff compliance with isolation precautions. In this article we examine patients’ awareness, understandings and observance of source-isolation practices and directives with a view to understanding better the roles patients play or could play in transmitting, or limiting transmission, of multidrug-resistant organisms (MRO). Seventeen source-isolated adult surgical patients and two relatives participated in video-reflexive ethnography and interviews. We learned that, although most of these patients wanted to protect themselves and others from colonisation/infection with a MRO, they had a limited understanding of what precautions they could take while in isolation and found it difficult to obtain ongoing information. Thus, many patients regularly left their source-isolation rooms without taking appropriate precautions and were potentially contributing to environmental contamination and transmission. Some patients also interacted with other patients and their personal belongings in ways that exposed other patients, unnecessarily, to colonisation/infection risk. By not providing patients with adequate information on infection risk or how they could contribute to their own safety or that of others, they are denied the opportunity to fully engage in their healthcare. To improve the efficacy of source-isolation and contact precautions in general, patient care providers should consider colonised or infected patients as active partners in reducing transmission and involve patients and relatives in regular, ongoing conversations about transmission prevention.Keywords: Patient involvement, patient experience, patient engagement, patient- and family-centred care, source-isolation, MRSA, infection prevention and control, qualitative methods, health literacy
机译:在大多数急性医疗机构中,隔离被多药耐药性生物定植或感染的患者(隔离源)是防止传染给其他患者的常见做法。在医院中提高源隔离效率的努力集中于医护人员遵守隔离预防措施。在本文中,我们检查了患者对源隔离实践和指令的认识,理解和遵守,以期更好地了解患者在传播或限制多重耐药性生物体(MRO)的传播中或可能扮演的角色。十七名按源隔离的成年外科手术患者和两名亲属参加了视频自记民族志和访谈。我们了解到,尽管这些患者中的大多数人都想保护自己和其他人免受MRO的定植/感染,但他们对孤立时可以采取的预防措施知之甚少,并且发现难以获得持续的信息。因此,许多患者在没有采取适当预防措施的情况下经常离开其源隔离室,并可能导致环境污染和传播。一些患者还以与其他患者不必要的接触定植/感染风险的方式与其他患者及其个人物品进行交互。如果没有为患者提供有关感染风险或他们如何为自己或他人的安全做出贡献的足够信息,那么他们将失去充分参与其医疗保健的机会。为了总体上提高隔离源的有效性和接触预防措施,患者护理提供者应将定植或感染的患者视为减少传播的积极伙伴,并让患者和亲属定期进行有关传播预防的日常对话。 ,患者参与,以患者和家庭为中心的护理,源隔离,MRSA,感染预防和控制,定性方法,健康素养

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号