首页> 外文OA文献 >Ahead of its Time: Historicity, Chronopolitics, and the Idea of the Avant-Garde after Modernismud
【2h】

Ahead of its Time: Historicity, Chronopolitics, and the Idea of the Avant-Garde after Modernismud

机译:时代的提前:历史性,时代政治和现代主义之后的前卫思想 ud

摘要

In its etymology and in popular discourse, the term ‘avant-garde’ is commonly associated with a future temporality, while in art-historical discourse, it represents a tradition of modernist innovation, periodised as ‘historical avant-garde’ and ‘neo-avant-garde’. Since this historical periodisation was first established in the 1950s, the avant-garde’s futurity has been repeatedly disputed, bringing the very notion of an avant-garde into question. This thesis takes as its starting point the predicament of ‘an avant-garde after the avant-garde’ as a means to investigate the philosophico-political implications of a historical temporality marked by ‘afterness’. Writing in critical dialogue with scholarship that has articulated the avant-garde as a notion of historical time, the thesis modifies the parameters of this scholarship by foregrounding the category of historicism, and by reformulating the avant-garde as a notion that both resists and inhabits historical periodisation. As a study at the disciplinary intersection of comparative literature and critical theory, 'Ahead of its Time' proceeds via close readings of selected theories of the avant-garde (German literary scholar Peter Bürger’s foundational Theory of the Avant-Garde in the 1970s; British art theorist John Roberts’ formulation of a ‘suspensive avant-garde’ in the twenty-first century; and the intellectual debates of the Italian circle Neoavanguardia in the 1960s), while also mobilising the critical resources available in the thought of Walter Benjamin. Through a non-linear, comparativist critical analysis that discusses these theories in, and as, a Benjaminian constellation, the thesis proposes the avant-garde as a relational, indexical category that is constitutively split between historical continuity and historical rupture. In this manner, 'Ahead of its Time' revisits the broader question of mediation between universality and particularity, and by recasting it in temporal terms, it advocates a chronopolitics of singularity, whereby the avant-garde’s split between continuity and rupture also reveals the ethically-necessary relationship between self-determination and contingency.
机译:在其词源学和流行话语中,“前卫”一词通常与未来的时空联系在一起,而在艺术史话语中,它代表了现代主义创新的传统,分作“历史前卫”和“新时代”。前卫”。自从1950年代首次建立这种历史性分期以来,前卫的未来性就屡屡受到争议,这使人们对前卫的概念产生了质疑。本文以“先驱者继先驱者”的困境为出发点,以此作为考察以“后世”为标志的历史时空的哲学政治含义的手段。在与学者的批判性对话中,将先锋派表达为历史时间的概念进行了写作,论文通过关注历史主义的范畴,并通过将先锋派重新定义为既抗拒又居住的概念,来修改该奖学金的参数。历史分期。作为比较文学与批判理论学科交叉研究的一项研究,“时代的前行”是通过仔细阅读一些先锋派理论而进行的(1970年代德国文学学者彼得·伯格(PeterBürger)提出的先锋派基础理论;英国人艺术理论家约翰·罗伯茨(John Roberts)在二十一世纪提出了“前卫性悬念”;在1960年代意大利圈子里进行了新先锋派的思想辩论),同时还动员了沃尔特·本杰明(Walter Benjamin)思想中的重要资源。通过对本雅明星座中的这些理论进行非线性的,比较主义的批判性分析,本文提出了将前卫作为关系性,索引性的类别,将其连续性地划分为历史连续性和历史性破裂。通过这种方式,“时代的前程”重新审视了普遍性和特殊性之间的广泛调解问题,并通过在时间上重铸它,倡导了单一性的时间政治,借以先锋派在连续性和破裂之间的分裂也揭示了伦理学-自决与偶然性之间的必要关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号