首页> 外文OA文献 >Cultural trauma, counter-narratives, and dialogical intellectuals: the works of Murakami Haruki and Mori Tatsuya in the context of the Aum affair
【2h】

Cultural trauma, counter-narratives, and dialogical intellectuals: the works of Murakami Haruki and Mori Tatsuya in the context of the Aum affair

机译:文化创伤,反叙事和对话知识分子:村上春树和森达也在奥姆事件中的作品

摘要

In this article, we offer a new conceptualization of intellectuals as carriers of cultural trauma through a case study of the Aum Affair, a series of crimes and terrorist attacks committed by the Japanese new religious movement Aum Shinrikyō. In understanding the performative roles intellectuals play in trauma construction, we offer a new dichotomy between “authoritative intellectuals,” who draw on their privileged parcours and status to impose a distinct trauma narrative, and “dialogical intellectuals,” who engage with local actors dialogically to produce polyphonic and open-ended trauma narratives. We identify three dimensions of dialogical intellectual action: firstly, the intellectuals may be involved in dialogue with local participants; secondly, the intellectual products themselves may be dialogical in content; and thirdly, there might be a concerted effort on the part of the intellectuals to record and to disseminate dialogue between local participants. In the context of the Aum Affair, we analyze the works of Murakami Haruki and Mori Tatsuya as dialogical intellectuals while they sought, with the help of local actors’ experiences, to challenge and to alter the orthodox trauma narrative of Aum Shinrikyō as exclusively a social evil external to Japanese society and an enemy to be excluded from it. Towards the end of the article, we discuss the broader significance of this case study and suggest that in light of recent societal and technological developments, the role and scope of dialogical intellectuals as carriers of trauma are changing and possibly expanding.
机译:在本文中,我们通过对Aum Affair(日本新宗教运动AumShinrikyō犯下的一系列犯罪和恐怖袭击)进行案例研究,提供了知识分子作为文化创伤载体的新概念。在理解知识分子在创伤建设中扮演的表演性角色时,我们提供了一种新的二分法,即“权威知识分子”和“对话知识分子”之间的区别是:“权威知识分子”利用自己的特权和地位施加独特的创伤性叙事;产生和弦和开放式的创伤叙事。我们确定了对话性知识分子行动的三个方面:首先,知识分子可能会参与与当地参与者的对话;其次,知识产品本身可能在内容上具有对话性。第三,知识分子可能会作出一致的努力,以记录和传播当地参与者之间的对话。在Aum Affair的背景下,我们对村上春树和森达也作为对话知识分子的作品进行了分析,而他们则在当地演员的经验的帮助下,试图挑战和改变AumShinrikyō的正统创伤叙事,使其成为一种纯粹的社会日本社会外部的邪恶和被排除在日本社会之外的敌人。在本文结尾处,我们讨论了此案例研究的更广泛意义,并建议鉴于最近的社会和技术发展,对话知识分子作为创伤载体的作用和范围正在改变,并且可能正在扩大。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ushiyama Rin; Baert Patrick;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号