首页> 外文OA文献 >A comparison of computer-assisted instruction versus traditional instruction in developmental studies mathematics: implications for administrative instructional change
【2h】

A comparison of computer-assisted instruction versus traditional instruction in developmental studies mathematics: implications for administrative instructional change

机译:发展研究数学中计算机辅助教学与传统教学的比较:对行政教学变革的启示

摘要

This study sought to determine whether there were significant differences in variables pertaining to academic performance of at-risk students enrolled in Developmental Studies mathematics when computer-assisted instruction (experimental group) was a factor and students in regular college algebra using traditional instruction (control group). The characteristics that these students held in common are low Scholastic Aptitude Test mathematics scores (below 350), low high school grade point average (2.0 or below), and over twenty years of age.The following independent variables were examined: (1) age and (2) gender. The dependent variables examined were: Scholastic Aptitude Test mathematics score (MSAT), (2) high school grade point average (HSGPA), (3) entry College Placement Examination (ECPE), (4) exit College Placement Examination (XCPE), (5) number of quarters required to exit The quasi-experimental design of this study consisted of a historical timeline approach. A version of the nonequivalent control group design was used to compare the variables of the control group with the variables of the experimental group. The data were analyzed using analysis of variance, t-test procedures, analysis of covariance, and multiple range test.It was found that SAT mathematics score, high school grade point average, entrance College Placement Examination score, exit College Placement Examination score, and maturity (age) were important variables when considering student success in mathematics. It was concluded that although computer-assisted instruction was not superior to traditional instruction, it did provide at-risk students with alternatives for study and practice. The implications from this study indicate that at-risk students have special needs to be addressed, and computer-assisted instruction fills some of those needs. It was recommended that computer-assisted instruction should be integrated into every phase of the curriculum, especially when working with at-risk students.
机译:这项研究试图确定,在计算机辅助教学(实验组)是一个因素并且常规代数的学生使用传统教学(对照组)的情况下,参与发展研究数学的高风险学生的学习成绩变量是否存在显着差异。 )。这些学生的共同特征是学业能力测验数学分数低(低于350),高中平均绩点低(2.0或以下)以及20岁以上。研究了以下独立变量:(1)年龄(2)性别。检验的因变量是:学术能力测验数学分数(MSAT),(2)高中平均成绩(HSGPA),(3)入学大学入学考试(ECPE),(4)出大学学入学考试(XCPE),( 5)退出所需的季度数本研究的准实验设计由历史时间轴方法组成。使用非等效对照组设计的一个版本将对照组的变量与实验组的变量进行比较。使用方差分析,t检验程序,协方差分析和多范围检验对数据进行分析,发现SAT数学分数,高中平均成绩,入学大学入学考试分数,出大学入学考试分数和在考虑学生在数学上的成功时,成熟度(年龄)是重要的变量。结论是,尽管计算机辅助教学并不优于传统教学,但它确实为处于危险中的学生提供了学习和练习的替代方法。这项研究的结果表明,有风险的学生有特殊的需要解决,而计算机辅助教学可以满足其中的一些需求。建议将计算机辅助教学纳入课程的每个阶段,尤其是在与高危学生一起工作时。

著录项

  • 作者

    Taylor Albert;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1997
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号