首页> 外文OA文献 >Evidence for Policy Making: Clinical Appropriateness Study of Lumbar Spine MRI Prescriptions Using RAND Appropriateness Method
【2h】

Evidence for Policy Making: Clinical Appropriateness Study of Lumbar Spine MRI Prescriptions Using RAND Appropriateness Method

机译:政策制定的证据:使用RAND适当方法的腰椎MRI处方的临床适当性研究

摘要

Background: MRI is a new and expensive diagnostic technology, which has been used increasinglyudall over the world. Low back pain is a worldwide prevalent disorder and MRI technique is one ofudthe several ways to diagnose it. This paper aims to identify the appropriateness of lumbar spineudMRI prescriptions in Shiraz teaching hospitals using standardized RAND Appropriateness Methodud(RAM) criteria in 2012.udMethods: This study consisted of two phases. The first phase involved a qualitative enquiry andudthe second phase had a quantitative cross-sectional nature. In the first phase RAM was usedudfor developing lumbar spine MRI indications and scenarios. In the second phase, the finalizedudscenarios were compared with the history and physical examination of 300 patients with low backudpain. The rate of appropriateness of lumbar spine MRI prescription was then calculated.udResults: Of 300 cases of lumbar spine MRI prescriptions, approximately 167 (56%) wereudconsidered inappropriate, 72 (24%) were uncertain, and 61 (20%) were deemed to be appropriate.udThe economic burden of inappropriate prescriptions was calculated at 88,009,000 Rials. Inudaddition, the types of expertise and physical examination were considered as related factors toudappropriateness of prescriptions.udConclusion: In conclusion, a large proportion of lumbar spine MRI prescriptions, which result inudfinancial burden on the insurance companies and the patients alike is unnecessary. This studyudsuggests that policy makers consider this evidence while decision-making. Our findings highlightudthe imperative role of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs).udAs a result, developing local clinical guidelines may create the commitment needed in physiciansudin prescribing appropriate prescriptions within the health sector. The study further recommendsudthat appropriate scenarios should be considered as a criterion for payment and reimbursement.
机译:背景:MRI是一种新的昂贵的诊断技术,在世界范围内已越来越广泛地使用。腰痛是世界范围内普遍存在的疾病,MRI技术是诊断它的几种方法之一。本文旨在采用标准的RAND适当性方法 ud(RAM)标准于2012年在设拉子教学医院中确定腰椎 udMRI处方的适用性。 ud方法:本研究分为两个阶段。第一阶段涉及定性探究,第二阶段具有定量的横截面性质。在第一阶段,RAM用于发展腰椎MRI适应症和情景。在第二阶段中,将最终的 udscenarios与300例下腰痛 udpain的病史和体格检查进行比较。结果:在300例腰椎MRI处方中,约有167例(56%)被认为不当,有72例(24%)不确定,有61例(20%) ud不适当处方的经济负担计算为88,009,000里亚尔。此外,专家的技能和体格检查的类型被认为与处方的不适当性有关。结论:总结而言,腰椎MRI处方中有很大一部分会给保险公司和患者带来财务负担一样是不必要的。这项研究建议决策者在决策时考虑这一证据。我们的研究结果突出了 ud卫生技术评估(HTA)和临床实践指南(CPGs)的重要作用。 ud因此,制定本地临床指南可能会为医师开辟在卫生部门开出适当处方的承诺。该研究进一步建议 ud应考虑适当的方案作为付款和报销的标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号