首页> 外文OA文献 >Simplified methods to inventory the current annual increment of forest standing volume
【2h】

Simplified methods to inventory the current annual increment of forest standing volume

机译:盘点当前每年森林蓄积量的简化方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The assessment of the current annual increment of forest standing volume(CAI) is a fundamental tool to support forest management and planning. A suitableapproach to such an end is to rely on growth and yield models. However,this kind of models are often not available for many countries and/or locationsand/or species. Furthermore, they may become obsolete due to potentialchanges in the environmental and silvicultural conditions. Such shortcomingsmay be distinctively detrimental in the context of forest inventories. Severalmethods have been proposed to inventory CAI on one single occasion, i.e.,when repeated measurements of standing volume are not available. A wellknownfamily of methods, still largely exploited in Alpine and EasternEuropean countries, derives from the estimation of the percentage current annualincrement of forest standing volume by the current annual increments ofstem diameter and tree height (Δh). In this study an experimental comparisonof Δh assessment by three different approaches is presented with reference toa properly designed case study: (i) Δh is measured on felled trees; (ii) Δh is estimatedby dynamic height curve (i.e., diameter-height-age model); (iii) Δh isestimated by conventional height curve (i.e., diameter-height model). Underthe examined experimental conditions (a pure forest of silver fir on highly fertilesoils in southern Italy, aged around 60 years), both simplified approaches(ii) and (iii) have proven to underestimate height increments, with a larger underestimationby the approach based on the conventional height curve. However,the consequent error in the estimation of percentage current annual incrementof forest standing volume has proved to be quite limited (4% for theapproach based on the dynamic height curve and around 9% for the approachbased on the conventional height curve). Hence, such simplified approachesmay be rather safely considered for estimating percentage current annual incrementof forest standing volume when neither Δh is directly detectable onstanding trees nor sample trees can be felled, nor an appropriate model topredict Δh is available. The Δh estimation on the conventional height curveshould turn out to be even more suitable in the case of uneven-aged stands,where the position of the height curve remains stationary over time.
机译:当前森林年蓄积量(CAI)年度增量的评估是支持森林管理和规划的基本工具。为此目的合适的方法是依靠增长和产量模型。但是,这种模型通常不适用于许多国家和/或位置和/或物种。此外,由于环境和造林条件的潜在变化,它们可能会过时。在森林资源清查的情况下,这些缺点可能是特别有害的。已经提出了几种方法来在一次情况下盘点CAI,即当无法重复测量站立体积时。一个众所周知的方法家族,仍然在高山和东欧国家中广泛使用,是通过当前树干直径和树高(Δh)的年度增量估算当前森林站立量的年度增量百分比得出的。在这项研究中,参考适当设计的案例研究,通过三种不同方法对Δh评估进行了实验比较:(i)在砍伐的树木上测量Δh; (ii)通过动态高度曲线(即直径-高度-年龄模型)估算Δh; (iii)通过常规的高度曲线(即直径-高度模型)估算Δh。在研究的实验条件下(意大利南部高肥力土壤上的纯银杉林,年龄约60岁),简化方法(ii)和(iii)均被证明低估了高度增量,而基于常规的高度曲线。然而,事实证明,在估计森林立木蓄积的年年增加百分比中,由此引起的误差是非常有限的(基于动态高度曲线的方法为4%,而基于常规高度曲线的方法为9%左右)。因此,当Δh不能直接检测到直立树,也不能砍伐样本树,或者没有合适的模型来预测Δh时,可以相当安全地考虑使用这种简化方法来估计森林立木蓄积的当前年度年增长百分比。传统的高度曲线上的Δh估计将更适合于年龄不均衡的看台,在这种情况下,高度曲线的位置会随着时间的推移保持固定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号