首页> 外文OA文献 >Confirmatory factor analysis of the neck disability index, comparing patients with whiplash associated disorders to a control group with non-specific neck pain
【2h】

Confirmatory factor analysis of the neck disability index, comparing patients with whiplash associated disorders to a control group with non-specific neck pain

机译:颈部残疾指数的验证性因素分析,将患有鞭打相关疾病的患者与非特异性颈部疼痛的对照组进行比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

ududPurpose The neck disability index (NDI) as a 10-item patient reported outcome (PRO) measure is the most commonly used whiplash associated disorders (WAD) assessment tool. However, statistical rigor and factor structure are not definitive. To date, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) has not examined whether the factor structure generalizes across different groups (e.g., WAD versus non-WAD). This study aimed to determine the psychometric properties of the NDI in these population groups.ududududThis study used CFA to analyze NDI baseline-data for WAD ( = 804; 69 % females) and non-WAD (n = 963; 67 % females), each for the full sample and separate genders. Invariance analyses examined the NDI structure across the four groups.ududududAcross both populations and gender subgroups the one-factor solutions consistently showed better model fit over two-factor solutions. The NDI was best characterized as one-dimensional and invariant across multiple sub-groups.ududududThe NDI remains a valid PRO in WAD populations that provides acceptable measurement of neck status that is appropriate for basic functional assessment across genders. However, it is recommended that both clinicians and researchers initiate the transition toward more rigorous and less ambiguous PRO measurement tools for WAD patients and research. This future graduated movement toward other PROs should consider both regional PROs and computerized decision support systems, initially measured concurrently with the NDI to establish ways to convert existing scored data prior to their singular use.
机译:Ud Udpurpose颈部残疾指数(NDI)作为10项患者报告结果(Pro)测量是最常用的鞭打相关障碍(WAD)评估工具。但是,统计严格和因子结构并不明确。迄今为止,没有检查确认因子分析(CFA)是否因子结构是否跨越不同的组推广(例如,WAD与非WAD)。本研究旨在确定这些人群组中NDI的心理学特性。 UD UD UD UD UDTHIS研究使用CFA分析WAD的NDI基线数据(= 804; 69%的女性)和非WAD(n = 963; 67%的女性),每个女性用于完整的样本和单独的性别。不变性分析检查了四组中的NDI结构。 UD UD UD UD Udacross两个人口和性别子组的一个因子解决方案一直显示出更好的模型适合两个因子解决方案。 NDI最合适地描述为跨多个子组的一维和不变性。 UD UD UD Ud UDI在WAD群体中仍然是一个有效的专业人群,提供可接受的颈部状态测量,这适用于各地的基本功能评估。然而,建议临床医生和研究人员在涉及患者和研究的更严格和更少暧昧的Pro测量工具中发起过渡。未来逐步逐步逐步逐步审议区域特权和计算机化决策支持系统,最初与NDI同时进行衡量,以建立在奇异使用前转换现有的进入数据的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号