首页> 外文OA文献 >Compressive strength of normal strength concrete (NSC) using British standard, euro code and non-destructive test approaches
【2h】

Compressive strength of normal strength concrete (NSC) using British standard, euro code and non-destructive test approaches

机译:使用英国标准,欧洲法规和无损检测方法的标准强度混凝土(NSC)的抗压强度

摘要

Concrete is a very important material and widely used in construction industry. It offers stability and design flexibility for the residential marketplace and environmental advantages through every stage of manufacturing and use. Locally, the characteristic compressive strength is usually measured based on 150 mm cubes according to BS approach. But in future, the design compressive strength is usually based on the standard 150 x 300 mm cylinders as recommendation by Eurocode. Compression Test, Rebound Hammer Test and Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity Test method are used to determine the compressive strength. Each of the method gives the different method to measure compressive strength value. Experimental results indicate that the ratio of cylinder to cube samples was ranging between 0.70 and 0.83. It was found, that on average, the ratio of the compressive strength of 150 x 300 mm cylinders to 150 mm cubes was 0.79. Rebound Hammer method was preferable to be used for Non Destructive Test due to the slightly differences of compressive strength value compared to Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity method. A comparison of the compressive strength between Compression Test method on cube, Rebound Hammer method and Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity method on prism was performed. These types of methods were chosen because it represented Destructive and Non Destructive test that are most commonly used locally in the construction industry and research.
机译:混凝土是非常重要的材料,并广泛用于建筑业。它为住宅市场提供稳定性和设计灵活性,并在制造和使用的每个阶段都具有环境优势。就局部而言,特征抗压强度通常根据BS方法基于150毫米的立方体进行测量。但是将来,设计抗压强度通常基于Eurocode推荐的标准150 x 300 mm圆柱体。压缩测试,回弹锤测试和超声波脉冲速度测试方法用于确定抗压强度。每种方法都提供了不同的方法来测量抗压强度值。实验结果表明,圆柱体样本与立方体样本的比率在0.70和0.83之间。已发现,平均而言,150 x 300 mm圆柱体与150 mm立方体的压缩强度之比为0.79。回弹锤法最好用于无损检测,因为与超声脉冲速度法相比,其抗压强度值略有不同。比较了立方体的压缩试验方法,回弹锤方法和棱镜的超声脉冲速度方法的抗压强度。选择这些类型的方法是因为它代表了破坏性和非破坏性测试,这是建筑行业和研究中最常用的本地方法。

著录项

  • 作者

    Tang Jian An;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号