首页> 外文OA文献 >Kinetic study of adsorption process using chitosan, activated carbon, and rice husk for monoethanolamine (mea) wastewater treatment via batch process
【2h】

Kinetic study of adsorption process using chitosan, activated carbon, and rice husk for monoethanolamine (mea) wastewater treatment via batch process

机译:壳聚糖,活性炭和稻壳对间歇法处理单乙醇胺废水的动力学研究

摘要

In petrochemical industry, monoethanolamine (MEA) is a common solvent used as absorption medium to remove carbon dioxide (CO2) from the gaseous stream. In the absorber, the reaction between CO2 and MEA will generate some salt and increased the amount of the suspended solids in an absorber due to direct contact between gas and liquid (two fluid phases). This phenomenon can cause a sudden foaming where will decreasing the absorption efficiency, increasing amine loses, reduced quality of product gas, and the MEA sometimes is not appropriate to feed back into the stripper because of the properties deterioration and gives difficulties in optimizing the absorption processes and it has been removed as wastewater. This study had been conducted to examine the best method of treating the MEA wastewater. Adsorption method had been chosen in this treatment with here different adsorbents that are activated carbon, chitosan and rice husk. Three different variables that are adsorbent dosage, mixing time and mixing speed were varied to examine the effect of residue oil and MEA concentration. Then, the kinetic model of adsorption of residue oil had been obtained. The analysis of the oil and grease and amine concentration was followed by APHA methods. The result showed activated carbon which is showed the highest adsorption value of residue oil in absorbent dosage (32.14%), mixing time (62.32%), and mixing speed (64.29%) compared to chitosan adsorption value of residue oil in absorbent dosage (28.13%), mixing time (46.43%), and mixing speed (53.57%) and rice husk adsorption value of residue oil in absorbent dosage (21.43%), mixing time (37.71%), and mixing speed (44.64%). The MEA concentration in all adsorbent used in this study does not affected by the adsorption treatment based on three parameter that was been tested. The kinetic model of activated carbon and rice husks followed first order pseudo (normally expressed in the range of reaction only) while chitosan followed second order pseudo (obtain a two step linear relationship) and this model agree with chemisorptions being rate controlling. As conclusion, the adsorption technique using activated carbon (powder), chitosan (powder), and rice husk (powder) can be of the selected adsorbents because they do not affected with MEA concentration
机译:在石化工业中,单乙醇胺(MEA)是用作吸收介质以从气流中去除二氧化碳(CO2)的常用溶剂。在吸收器中,由于气体和液体(两个液相)之间的直接接触,CO2和MEA之间的反应将产生一些盐,并增加吸收器中的悬浮固体量。这种现象可能导致突然起泡,从而降低吸收效率,增加胺损失,降低产品气体的质量,并且由于性能下降,MEA有时不适合反馈到汽提塔中,并且难以优化吸收过程并已作为废水去除。进行这项研究是为了研究处理MEA废水的最佳方法。在这种处理中选择了吸附方法,其中使用了不同的吸附剂,这些吸附剂是活性炭,壳聚糖和稻壳。改变了三个不同的变量,即吸附剂的用量,混合时间和混合速度,以检验渣油和MEA浓度的影响。然后,获得了渣油吸附的动力学模型。用APHA方法分析油脂和胺的浓度。结果表明,活性炭与吸收剂中渣油的壳聚糖吸附值相比,吸收剂中渣油的吸附值最高(32.14%),混合时间(62.32%)和混合速度(64.29%)最高。混合时间(46.43%),混合速度(53.57%)和稻壳对渣油在吸收剂用量中的吸附值(21.43%),混合时间(37.71%)和混合速度(44.64%)。根据测试的三个参数,本研究中使用的所有吸附剂中的MEA浓度均不受吸附处理的影响。活性炭和稻壳的动力学模型遵循一阶拟态(通常仅在反应范围内表达),而壳聚糖遵循二阶拟态(获得两步线性关系),并且该模型与化学吸附控制速率相吻合。结论是,使用活性炭(粉末),壳聚糖(粉末)和稻壳(粉末)的吸附技术可能是所选的吸附剂,因为它们不会影响MEA浓度

著录项

  • 作者

    Siti Zulaikha Isa;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号